Risultati di Calcio: Pronostici utilizzando Data Mining
Software data mining utilizzato: [Data.Mining.Fox® (DMF) di Easy.Data.Mining™]
Attenzione per favore rispetto a nostro [avviso legale] per le seguenti previsioni.
Classifiche finali: Premier League 2015/16
Giornata 38: Premier League 2015/16: pronostici @ z% DMSC* >>> risultati reali:
2016-05-15: | Arsenal | – | Aston Villa | 2 | – | 0 | @ 65% | >>> | 4 | – | 0 |
2016-05-15: | Chelsea | – | Leicester | 1 | – | 1 | @ 31% | >>> | 1 | – | 1 |
2016-05-15: | Everton | – | Norwich City FC | 2 | – | 1 | @ 48% | >>> | 3 | – | 0 |
2016-05-15: | Man Utd | – | AFC Bournemouth | 2 | – | 0 | @ 59% | >>> | 3 | – | 1 |
2016-05-15: | Newcastle | – | Tottenham | 0 | – | 2 | @ 38% | >>> | 5 | – | 1 |
2016-05-15: | Southampton | – | C.Palace | 2 | – | 1 | @ 53% | >>> | 4 | – | 1 |
2016-05-15: | Stoke City | – | West Ham | 1 | – | 1 | @ 36% | >>> | 2 | – | 1 |
2016-05-15: | Swansea | – | Man City | 0 | – | 2 | @ 40% | >>> | 1 | – | 1 |
2016-05-15: | FC Watford | – | Sunderland | 1 | – | 1 | @ 44% | >>> | 2 | – | 2 |
2016-05-15: | WBA | – | Liverpool | 1 | – | 2 | @ 45% | >>> | 1 | – | 1 |
Quota della tendenza per giornata 38: 6 su 10 / 60% (“per caso” sarebbe ø ~33%)
Quota corretta dalla giornata 1: 169 su 380 / 44% (“per caso” sarebbe ø ~33%)
Clicca qui per l’intera lista delle [statistiche per squadra] finora, e qui per vedere gli [indici di successo per varie categorie di previsione].
* DMSC (Data.Mining.Soccer-Confidence) è una percentuale di confidenza statistica che procura un’informazione per quanto riguarda la validità statistica di una previsione. Per ulteriori informazioni su questa quota ibrida artificiale puoi consultare la nostra sezione [Nostra analisi].
Giornata 37: Premier League 2015/16: pronostici @ z% DMSC* >>> risultati reali:
2016-05-07: | Norwich City FC | – | Man Utd | 0 | – | 2 | @ 42% | >>> | 0 | – | 1 |
2016-05-07: | Aston Villa | – | Newcastle | 1 | – | 2 | @ 43% | >>> | 0 | – | 0 |
2016-05-07: | AFC Bournemouth | – | WBA | 2 | – | 1 | @ 40% | >>> | 1 | – | 1 |
2016-05-07: | C.Palace | – | Stoke City | 1 | – | 1 | @ 36% | >>> | 2 | – | 1 |
2016-05-07: | Sunderland | – | Chelsea | 0 | – | 1 | @ 39% | >>> | 3 | – | 2 |
2016-05-07: | West Ham | – | Swansea | 2 | – | 1 | @ 43% | >>> | 1 | – | 4 |
2016-05-07: | Leicester | – | Everton | 2 | – | 1 | @ 45% | >>> | 3 | – | 1 |
2016-05-08: | Tottenham | – | Southampton | 2 | – | 0 | @ 46% | >>> | 1 | – | 2 |
2016-05-08: | Liverpool | – | FC Watford | 2 | – | 0 | @ 53% | >>> | 2 | – | 0 |
2016-05-08: | Man City | – | Arsenal | 1 | – | 1 | @ 35% | >>> | 2 | – | 2 |
Quota della tendenza per giornata 37: 4 su 10 / 40% (“per caso” sarebbe ø ~33%)
Quota corretta dalla giornata 1: 163 su 370 / 44% (“per caso” sarebbe ø ~33%)
Giornata 36: Premier League 2015/16: pronostici @ z% DMSC* >>> risultati reali:
2016-04-30: | Everton | – | AFC Bournemouth | 1 | – | 1 | @ 39% | >>> | 2 | – | 1 |
2016-04-30: | Newcastle | – | C.Palace | 1 | – | 1 | @ 39% | >>> | 1 | – | 0 |
2016-04-30: | Stoke City | – | Sunderland | 2 | – | 1 | @ 43% | >>> | 1 | – | 1 |
2016-04-30: | FC Watford | – | Aston Villa | 2 | – | 0 | @ 57% | >>> | 3 | – | 2 |
2016-04-30: | WBA | – | West Ham | 1 | – | 1 | @ 39% | >>> | 0 | – | 3 |
2016-04-30: | Arsenal | – | Norwich City FC | 2 | – | 0 | @ 62% | >>> | 1 | – | 0 |
2016-05-01: | Swansea | – | Liverpool | 1 | – | 2 | @ 41% | >>> | 3 | – | 1 |
2016-05-01: | Man Utd | – | Leicester | 2 | – | 1 | @ 44% | >>> | 1 | – | 1 |
2016-05-01: | Southampton | – | Man City | 1 | – | 2 | @ 36% | >>> | 4 | – | 2 |
2016-05-02: | Chelsea | – | Tottenham | 1 | – | 1 | @ 32% | >>> | 2 | – | 2 |
Quota della tendenza per giornata 36: 3 su 10 / 30% (“per caso” sarebbe ø ~33%)
Quota corretta dalla giornata 1: 159 su 360 / 44% (“per caso” sarebbe ø ~33%)
Giornata 35: Premier League 2015/16: pronostici @ z% DMSC* >>> risultati reali:
2016-04-13: | C.Palace | – | Everton | 1 | – | 1 | @ 33% | >>> | 0 | – | 0 |
2016-04-23: | Man City | – | Stoke City | 2 | – | 0 | @ 59% | >>> | 4 | – | 0 |
2016-04-23: | Aston Villa | – | Southampton | 1 | – | 2 | @ 54% | >>> | 2 | – | 4 |
2016-04-23: | AFC Bournemouth | – | Chelsea | 0 | – | 1 | @ 33% | >>> | 1 | – | 4 |
2016-04-23: | Liverpool | – | Newcastle | 2 | – | 0 | @ 59% | >>> | 2 | – | 2 |
2016-04-24: | Sunderland | – | Arsenal | 0 | – | 2 | @ 50% | >>> | 0 | – | 0 |
2016-04-24: | Leicester | – | Swansea | 1 | – | 0 | @ 52% | >>> | 4 | – | 0 |
2016-04-25: | Tottenham | – | WBA | 2 | – | 0 | @ 66% | >>> | 1 | – | 1 |
2016-05-10: | West Ham | – | Man Utd | 1 | – | 2 | @ 35% | >>> | 3 | – | 2 |
2016-05-11: | Norwich City FC | – | FC Watford | 1 | – | 1 | @ 42% | >>> | 4 | – | 2 |
Quota della tendenza per giornata 35: 5 su 10 / 50% (“per caso” sarebbe ø ~33%)
Quota corretta dalla giornata 1: 156 su 350 / 45% (“per caso” sarebbe ø ~33%)
Giornata 34: Premier League 2015/16: pronostici @ z% DMSC* >>> risultati reali:
2016-04-16: | Norwich City FC | – | Sunderland | 2 | – | 1 | @ 43% | >>> | 0 | – | 3 |
2016-04-16: | Everton | – | Southampton | 1 | – | 2 | @ 36% | >>> | 1 | – | 1 |
2016-04-16: | Man Utd | – | Aston Villa | 2 | – | 0 | @ 63% | >>> | 1 | – | 0 |
2016-04-16: | Newcastle | – | Swansea | 1 | – | 2 | @ 38% | >>> | 3 | – | 0 |
2016-04-16: | WBA | – | FC Watford | 1 | – | 1 | @ 39% | >>> | 0 | – | 1 |
2016-04-16: | Chelsea | – | Man City | 1 | – | 1 | @ 37% | >>> | 0 | – | 3 |
2016-04-17: | AFC Bournemouth | – | Liverpool | 1 | – | 1 | @ 42% | >>> | 1 | – | 2 |
2016-04-17: | Leicester | – | West Ham | 1 | – | 0 | @ 45% | >>> | 2 | – | 2 |
2016-04-17: | Arsenal | – | C.Palace | 2 | – | 0 | @ 57% | >>> | 1 | – | 1 |
2016-04-18: | Stoke City | – | Tottenham | 1 | – | 2 | @ 48% | >>> | 0 | – | 4 |
Quota della tendenza per giornata 34: 2 su 10 / 20% (“per caso” sarebbe ø ~33%)
Quota corretta dalla giornata 1: 151 su 340 / 44% (“per caso” sarebbe ø ~33%)
Giornata 33: Premier League 2015/16: pronostici @ z% DMSC* >>> risultati reali:
2016-04-09: | West Ham | – | Arsenal | 1 | – | 2 | @ 40% | >>> | 3 | – | 3 |
2016-04-09: | Aston Villa | – | AFC Bournemouth | 1 | – | 2 | @ 41% | >>> | 1 | – | 2 |
2016-04-09: | C.Palace | – | Norwich City FC | 1 | – | 1 | @ 36% | >>> | 1 | – | 0 |
2016-04-09: | Southampton | – | Newcastle | 2 | – | 0 | @ 55% | >>> | 3 | – | 1 |
2016-04-09: | Swansea | – | Chelsea | 0 | – | 2 | @ 38% | >>> | 1 | – | 0 |
2016-04-09: | FC Watford | – | Everton | 0 | – | 0 | @ 42% | >>> | 1 | – | 1 |
2016-04-09: | Man City | – | WBA | 2 | – | 0 | @ 52% | >>> | 2 | – | 1 |
2016-04-10: | Sunderland | – | Leicester | 0 | – | 1 | @ 47% | >>> | 0 | – | 2 |
2016-04-10: | Liverpool | – | Stoke City | 2 | – | 1 | @ 42% | >>> | 4 | – | 1 |
2016-04-10: | Tottenham | – | Man Utd | 2 | – | 1 | @ 44% | >>> | 3 | – | 0 |
Quota della tendenza per giornata 33: 7 su 10 / 70% (“per caso” sarebbe ø ~33%)
Quota corretta dalla giornata 1: 149 su 330 / 45% (“per caso” sarebbe ø ~33%)
Giornata 32: Premier League 2015/16: pronostici @ z% DMSC* >>> risultati reali:
2016-04-02: | Aston Villa | – | Chelsea | 0 | – | 2 | @ 53% | >>> | 0 | – | 4 |
2016-04-02: | Arsenal | – | FC Watford | 2 | – | 0 | @ 58% | >>> | 4 | – | 0 |
2016-04-02: | AFC Bournemouth | – | Man City | 1 | – | 2 | @ 38% | >>> | 0 | – | 4 |
2016-04-02: | Norwich City FC | – | Newcastle | 0 | – | 0 | @ 38% | >>> | 3 | – | 2 |
2016-04-02: | Stoke City | – | Swansea | 1 | – | 1 | @ 42% | >>> | 2 | – | 2 |
2016-04-02: | Sunderland | – | WBA | 1 | – | 1 | @ 40% | >>> | 0 | – | 0 |
2016-04-02: | West Ham | – | C.Palace | 2 | – | 1 | @ 49% | >>> | 2 | – | 2 |
2016-04-02: | Liverpool | – | Tottenham | 1 | – | 1 | @ 33% | >>> | 1 | – | 1 |
2016-04-03: | Leicester | – | Southampton | 1 | – | 0 | @ 43% | >>> | 1 | – | 0 |
2016-04-03: | Man Utd | – | Everton | 2 | – | 1 | @ 49% | >>> | 1 | – | 0 |
Quota della tendenza per giornata 32: 8 su 10 / 80% (“per caso” sarebbe ø ~33%)
Quota corretta dalla giornata 1: 142 su 320 / 44% (“per caso” sarebbe ø ~33%)
Giornata 31: Premier League 2015/16: pronostici @ z% DMSC* >>> risultati reali:
2016-03-19: | Everton | – | Arsenal | 1 | – | 1 | @ 46% | >>> | 0 | – | 2 |
2016-03-19: | Chelsea | – | West Ham | 2 | – | 0 | @ 39% | >>> | 2 | – | 2 |
2016-03-19: | C.Palace | – | Leicester | 0 | – | 1 | @ 45% | >>> | 0 | – | 1 |
2016-03-19: | FC Watford | – | Stoke City | 1 | – | 2 | @ 37% | >>> | 1 | – | 2 |
2016-03-19: | WBA | – | Norwich City FC | 2 | – | 1 | @ 46% | >>> | 0 | – | 1 |
2016-03-19: | Swansea | – | Aston Villa | 2 | – | 0 | @ 56% | >>> | 1 | – | 0 |
2016-03-20: | Newcastle | – | Sunderland | 2 | – | 1 | @ 42% | >>> | 1 | – | 1 |
2016-03-20: | Southampton | – | Liverpool | 1 | – | 1 | @ 42% | >>> | 3 | – | 2 |
2016-03-20: | Man City | – | Man Utd | 2 | – | 1 | @ 46% | >>> | 0 | – | 1 |
2016-03-20: | Tottenham | – | AFC Bournemouth | 2 | – | 0 | @ 50% | >>> | 3 | – | 0 |
Quota della tendenza per giornata 31: 4 su 10 / 40% (“per caso” sarebbe ø ~33%)
Quota corretta dalla giornata 1: 134 su 310 / 43% (“per caso” sarebbe ø ~33%)
Giornata 30: Premier League 2015/16: pronostici @ z% DMSC* >>> risultati reali:
2016-03-12: | Norwich City FC | – | Man City | 0 | – | 2 | @ 54% | >>> | 0 | – | 0 |
2016-03-12: | AFC Bournemouth | – | Swansea | 1 | – | 1 | @ 41% | >>> | 3 | – | 2 |
2016-03-12: | Man Utd | – | C.Palace | 2 | – | 0 | @ 52% | >>> | 2 | – | 0 |
2016-03-12: | Stoke City | – | Southampton | 2 | – | 1 | @ 41% | >>> | 1 | – | 2 |
2016-03-12: | Sunderland | – | Everton | 0 | – | 1 | @ 38% | >>> | 3 | – | 0 |
2016-03-12: | West Ham | – | FC Watford | 2 | – | 0 | @ 53% | >>> | 3 | – | 1 |
2016-03-12: | Arsenal | – | WBA | 2 | – | 0 | @ 47% | >>> | 2 | – | 0 |
2016-03-13: | Aston Villa | – | Tottenham | 0 | – | 2 | @ 59% | >>> | 0 | – | 2 |
2016-03-13: | Liverpool | – | Chelsea | 1 | – | 1 | @ 36% | >>> | 1 | – | 1 |
2016-03-14: | Leicester | – | Newcastle | 1 | – | 0 | @ 55% | >>> | 1 | – | 0 |
Quota della tendenza per giornata 30: 6 su 10 / 60% (“per caso” sarebbe ø ~33%)
Quota corretta dalla giornata 1: 130 su 300 / 43% (“per caso” sarebbe ø ~33%)
Giornata 29: Premier League 2015/16: pronostici @ z% DMSC* >>> risultati reali:
2016-03-05: | Tottenham | – | Arsenal | 2 | – | 1 | @ 49% | >>> | 2 | – | 2 |
2016-03-05: | Chelsea | – | Stoke City | 2 | – | 0 | @ 46% | >>> | 1 | – | 1 |
2016-03-05: | Everton | – | West Ham | 2 | – | 1 | @ 37% | >>> | 2 | – | 3 |
2016-03-05: | Man City | – | Aston Villa | 2 | – | 0 | @ 55% | >>> | 4 | – | 0 |
2016-03-05: | Newcastle | – | AFC Bournemouth | 1 | – | 1 | @ 36% | >>> | 1 | – | 3 |
2016-03-05: | Southampton | – | Sunderland | 2 | – | 0 | @ 55% | >>> | 1 | – | 1 |
2016-03-05: | Swansea | – | Norwich City FC | 2 | – | 1 | @ 55% | >>> | 1 | – | 0 |
2016-03-05: | FC Watford | – | Leicester | 1 | – | 2 | @ 39% | >>> | 0 | – | 1 |
2016-03-06: | C.Palace | – | Liverpool | 1 | – | 2 | @ 45% | >>> | 1 | – | 2 |
2016-03-06: | WBA | – | Man Utd | 0 | – | 1 | @ 40% | >>> | 1 | – | 0 |
Quota della tendenza per giornata 29: 4 su 10 / 40% (“per caso” sarebbe ø ~33%)
Quota corretta dalla giornata 1: 124 su 290 / 43% (“per caso” sarebbe ø ~33%)
Giornata 28: Premier League 2015/16: pronostici @ z% DMSC* >>> risultati reali:
2016-03-01: | Aston Villa | – | Everton | 0 | – | 1 | @ 44% | >>> | 1 | – | 3 |
2016-03-01: | AFC Bournemouth | – | Southampton | 1 | – | 2 | @ 40% | >>> | 2 | – | 0 |
2016-03-01: | Leicester | – | WBA | 1 | – | 0 | @ 52% | >>> | 2 | – | 2 |
2016-03-01: | Norwich City FC | – | Chelsea | 0 | – | 2 | @ 47% | >>> | 1 | – | 2 |
2016-03-01: | Sunderland | – | C.Palace | 1 | – | 1 | @ 35% | >>> | 2 | – | 2 |
2016-03-02: | Arsenal | – | Swansea | 2 | – | 0 | @ 59% | >>> | 1 | – | 2 |
2016-03-02: | West Ham | – | Tottenham | 1 | – | 2 | @ 42% | >>> | 1 | – | 0 |
2016-03-02: | Stoke City | – | Newcastle | 2 | – | 1 | @ 47% | >>> | 1 | – | 0 |
2016-03-02: | Liverpool | – | Man City | 1 | – | 1 | @ 43% | >>> | 3 | – | 0 |
2016-03-02: | Man Utd | – | FC Watford | 2 | – | 0 | @ 50% | >>> | 1 | – | 0 |
Quota della tendenza per giornata 28: 5 su 10 / 50% (“per caso” sarebbe ø ~33%)
Quota corretta dalla giornata 1: 120 su 280 / 43% (“per caso” sarebbe ø ~33%)
Giornata 27: Premier League 2015/16: pronostici @ z% DMSC* >>> risultati reali:
2016-02-27: | West Ham | – | Sunderland | 2 | – | 0 | @ 52% | >>> | 1 | – | 0 |
2016-02-27: | Leicester | – | Norwich City FC | 1 | – | 0 | @ 51% | >>> | 1 | – | 0 |
2016-02-27: | Southampton | – | Chelsea | 1 | – | 1 | @ 28% | >>> | 1 | – | 2 |
2016-02-27: | Stoke City | – | Aston Villa | 2 | – | 1 | @ 50% | >>> | 2 | – | 1 |
2016-02-27: | FC Watford | – | AFC Bournemouth | 2 | – | 1 | @ 42% | >>> | 0 | – | 0 |
2016-02-27: | WBA | – | C.Palace | 1 | – | 1 | @ 39% | >>> | 3 | – | 2 |
2016-02-28: | Liverpool | – | Everton | 2 | – | 1 | @ 43% | >>> | 4 | – | 0 |
2016-02-28: | Newcastle | – | Man City | 1 | – | 2 | @ 42% | >>> | 1 | – | 1 |
2016-02-28: | Man Utd | – | Arsenal | 1 | – | 1 | @ 44% | >>> | 3 | – | 2 |
2016-02-28: | Tottenham | – | Swansea | 2 | – | 0 | @ 65% | >>> | 2 | – | 1 |
Quota della tendenza per giornata 27: 5 su 10 / 50% (“per caso” sarebbe ø ~33%)
Quota corretta dalla giornata 1: 115 su 270 / 43% (“per caso” sarebbe ø ~33%)
Giornata 26: Premier League 2015/16: pronostici @ z% DMSC* >>> risultati reali:
2016-02-13: | Sunderland | – | Man Utd | 0 | – | 2 | @ 46% | >>> | 2 | – | 1 |
2016-02-13: | AFC Bournemouth | – | Stoke City | 1 | – | 1 | @ 35% | >>> | 1 | – | 3 |
2016-02-13: | C.Palace | – | FC Watford | 1 | – | 1 | @ 39% | >>> | 1 | – | 2 |
2016-02-13: | Everton | – | WBA | 2 | – | 0 | @ 54% | >>> | 0 | – | 1 |
2016-02-13: | Norwich City FC | – | West Ham | 1 | – | 1 | @ 37% | >>> | 2 | – | 2 |
2016-02-13: | Swansea | – | Southampton | 1 | – | 2 | @ 37% | >>> | 0 | – | 1 |
2016-02-13: | Chelsea | – | Newcastle | 2 | – | 0 | @ 52% | >>> | 5 | – | 1 |
2016-02-14: | Arsenal | – | Leicester | 2 | – | 1 | @ 45% | >>> | 2 | – | 1 |
2016-02-14: | Aston Villa | – | Liverpool | 1 | – | 2 | @ 42% | >>> | 0 | – | 6 |
2016-02-14: | Man City | – | Tottenham | 2 | – | 2 | @ 36% | >>> | 1 | – | 2 |
Quota della tendenza per giornata 26: 5 su 10 / 50% (“per caso” sarebbe ø ~33%)
Quota corretta dalla giornata 1: 110 su 260 / 42% (“per caso” sarebbe ø ~33%)
Giornata 25: Premier League 2015/16: pronostici @ z% DMSC* >>> risultati reali:
2016-02-06: | Man City | – | Leicester | 1 | – | 0 | @ 48% | >>> | 1 | – | 3 |
2016-02-06: | Aston Villa | – | Norwich City FC | 2 | – | 1 | @ 41% | >>> | 2 | – | 0 |
2016-02-06: | Liverpool | – | Sunderland | 2 | – | 0 | @ 54% | >>> | 2 | – | 2 |
2016-02-06: | Newcastle | – | WBA | 2 | – | 1 | @ 41% | >>> | 1 | – | 0 |
2016-02-06: | Stoke City | – | Everton | 1 | – | 1 | @ 33% | >>> | 0 | – | 3 |
2016-02-06: | Swansea | – | C.Palace | 2 | – | 1 | @ 43% | >>> | 1 | – | 1 |
2016-02-06: | Tottenham | – | FC Watford | 2 | – | 1 | @ 58% | >>> | 1 | – | 0 |
2016-02-06: | Southampton | – | West Ham | 1 | – | 0 | @ 41% | >>> | 1 | – | 0 |
2016-02-07: | AFC Bournemouth | – | Arsenal | 1 | – | 2 | @ 40% | >>> | 0 | – | 2 |
2016-02-07: | Chelsea | – | Man Utd | 1 | – | 1 | @ 35% | >>> | 1 | – | 1 |
Quota della tendenza per giornata 25: 6 su 10 / 60% (“per caso” sarebbe ø ~33%)
Quota corretta dalla giornata 1: 105 su 250 / 42% (“per caso” sarebbe ø ~33%)
Giornata 24: Premier League 2015/16: pronostici @ z% DMSC* >>> risultati reali:
2016-02-02: | Arsenal | – | Southampton | 2 | – | 1 | @ 50% | >>> | 0 | – | 0 |
2016-02-02: | Leicester | – | Liverpool | 2 | – | 2 | @ 37% | >>> | 2 | – | 0 |
2016-02-02: | Norwich City FC | – | Tottenham | 1 | – | 2 | @ 52% | >>> | 0 | – | 3 |
2016-02-02: | Sunderland | – | Man City | 0 | – | 2 | @ 48% | >>> | 0 | – | 1 |
2016-02-02: | West Ham | – | Aston Villa | 2 | – | 1 | @ 53% | >>> | 2 | – | 0 |
2016-02-02: | C.Palace | – | AFC Bournemouth | 0 | – | 0 | @ 35% | >>> | 1 | – | 2 |
2016-02-02: | Man Utd | – | Stoke City | 2 | – | 1 | @ 45% | >>> | 3 | – | 0 |
2016-02-02: | WBA | – | Swansea | 1 | – | 1 | @ 36% | >>> | 1 | – | 1 |
2016-02-03: | FC Watford | – | Chelsea | 0 | – | 1 | @ 37% | >>> | 0 | – | 0 |
2016-02-03: | Everton | – | Newcastle | 2 | – | 0 | @ 41% | >>> | 3 | – | 0 |
Quota della tendenza per giornata 24: 6 su 10 / 60% (“per caso” sarebbe ø ~33%)
Quota corretta dalla giornata 1: 99 su 240 / 41% (“per caso” sarebbe ø ~33%)
Giornata 23: Premier League 2015/16: pronostici @ z% DMSC* >>> risultati reali:
2016-01-23: | Norwich City FC | – | Liverpool | 1 | – | 2 | @ 39% | >>> | 4 | – | 5 |
2016-01-23: | C.Palace | – | Tottenham | 1 | – | 2 | @ 48% | >>> | 1 | – | 3 |
2016-01-23: | Leicester | – | Stoke City | 1 | – | 1 | @ 39% | >>> | 3 | – | 0 |
2016-01-23: | Man Utd | – | Southampton | 2 | – | 1 | @ 43% | >>> | 0 | – | 1 |
2016-01-23: | Sunderland | – | AFC Bournemouth | 1 | – | 2 | @ 39% | >>> | 1 | – | 1 |
2016-01-23: | FC Watford | – | Newcastle | 1 | – | 1 | @ 37% | >>> | 2 | – | 1 |
2016-01-23: | WBA | – | Aston Villa | 2 | – | 1 | @ 44% | >>> | 0 | – | 0 |
2016-01-23: | West Ham | – | Man City | 1 | – | 2 | @ 43% | >>> | 2 | – | 2 |
2016-01-24: | Everton | – | Swansea | 2 | – | 1 | @ 46% | >>> | 1 | – | 2 |
2016-01-24: | Arsenal | – | Chelsea | 2 | – | 1 | @ 49% | >>> | 0 | – | 1 |
Quota della tendenza per giornata 23: 2 su 10 / 20% (“per caso” sarebbe ø ~33%)
Quota corretta dalla giornata 1: 93 su 230 / 40% (“per caso” sarebbe ø ~33%)
Giornata 22: Premier League 2015/16: pronostici @ z% DMSC* >>> risultati reali:
2016-01-16: | Tottenham | – | Sunderland | 2 | – | 0 | @ 59% | >>> | 4 | – | 1 |
2016-01-16: | AFC Bournemouth | – | Norwich City FC | 1 | – | 1 | @ 41% | >>> | 3 | – | 0 |
2016-01-16: | Chelsea | – | Everton | 1 | – | 0 | @ 43% | >>> | 3 | – | 3 |
2016-01-16: | Man City | – | C.Palace | 2 | – | 1 | @ 59% | >>> | 4 | – | 0 |
2016-01-16: | Newcastle | – | West Ham | 1 | – | 2 | @ 40% | >>> | 2 | – | 1 |
2016-01-16: | Southampton | – | WBA | 2 | – | 1 | @ 49% | >>> | 3 | – | 0 |
2016-01-16: | Aston Villa | – | Leicester | 0 | – | 1 | @ 47% | >>> | 1 | – | 1 |
2016-01-17: | Liverpool | – | Man Utd | 2 | – | 2 | @ 45% | >>> | 0 | – | 1 |
2016-01-17: | Stoke City | – | Arsenal | 1 | – | 2 | @ 42% | >>> | 0 | – | 0 |
2016-01-18: | Swansea | – | FC Watford | 1 | – | 1 | @ 39% | >>> | 1 | – | 0 |
Quota della tendenza per giornata 22: 3 su 10 / 30% (“per caso” sarebbe ø ~33%)
Quota corretta dalla giornata 1: 91 su 220 / 41% (“per caso” sarebbe ø ~33%)
Giornata 21: Premier League 2015/16: pronostici @ z% DMSC* >>> risultati reali:
2016-01-12: | Aston Villa | – | C.Palace | 1 | – | 2 | @ 44% | >>> | 1 | – | 0 |
2016-01-12: | AFC Bournemouth | – | West Ham | 1 | – | 1 | @ 34% | >>> | 1 | – | 3 |
2016-01-13: | Swansea | – | Sunderland | 2 | – | 1 | @ 48% | >>> | 2 | – | 4 |
2016-01-12: | Newcastle | – | Man Utd | 0 | – | 1 | @ 47% | >>> | 3 | – | 3 |
2016-01-13: | Chelsea | – | WBA | 1 | – | 0 | @ 49% | >>> | 2 | – | 2 |
2016-01-13: | Man City | – | Everton | 2 | – | 1 | @ 61% | >>> | 0 | – | 0 |
2016-01-13: | Southampton | – | FC Watford | 1 | – | 1 | @ 34% | >>> | 2 | – | 0 |
2016-01-13: | Stoke City | – | Norwich City FC | 2 | – | 1 | @ 42% | >>> | 3 | – | 1 |
2016-01-13: | Liverpool | – | Arsenal | 2 | – | 2 | @ 36% | >>> | 3 | – | 3 |
2016-01-13: | Tottenham | – | Leicester | 1 | – | 1 | @ 40% | >>> | 0 | – | 1 |
Quota della tendenza per giornata 21: 2 su 10 / 20% (“per caso” sarebbe ø ~33%)
Quota corretta dalla giornata 1: 88 su 210 / 42% (“per caso” sarebbe ø ~33%)
Giornata 20: Premier League 2015/16: pronostici @ z% DMSC* >>> risultati reali:
2016-01-02: | West Ham | – | Liverpool | 0 | – | 1 | @ 36% | >>> | 2 | – | 0 |
2016-01-02: | Arsenal | – | Newcastle | 2 | – | 0 | @ 69% | >>> | 1 | – | 0 |
2016-01-02: | Leicester | – | AFC Bournemouth | 2 | – | 1 | @ 52% | >>> | 0 | – | 0 |
2016-01-02: | Man Utd | – | Swansea | 2 | – | 1 | @ 52% | >>> | 2 | – | 1 |
2016-01-02: | Norwich City FC | – | Southampton | 1 | – | 1 | @ 31% | >>> | 1 | – | 0 |
2016-01-02: | Sunderland | – | Aston Villa | 0 | – | 0 | @ 44% | >>> | 3 | – | 1 |
2016-01-02: | WBA | – | Stoke City | 1 | – | 2 | @ 40% | >>> | 2 | – | 1 |
2016-01-02: | FC Watford | – | Man City | 1 | – | 2 | @ 46% | >>> | 1 | – | 2 |
2016-01-03: | C.Palace | – | Chelsea | 1 | – | 1 | @ 29% | >>> | 0 | – | 3 |
2016-01-03: | Everton | – | Tottenham | 0 | – | 1 | @ 47% | >>> | 1 | – | 1 |
Quota della tendenza per giornata 20: 3 su 10 / 30% (“per caso” sarebbe ø ~33%)
Quota corretta dalla giornata 1: 86 su 200 / 43% (“per caso” sarebbe ø ~33%)
Giornata 19: Premier League 2015/16: pronostici @ z% DMSC* >>> risultati reali:
2015-12-28: | C.Palace | – | Swansea | 2 | – | 1 | @ 50% | >>> | 0 | – | 0 |
2015-12-28: | Everton | – | Stoke City | 1 | – | 1 | @ 39% | >>> | 3 | – | 4 |
2015-12-28: | Norwich City FC | – | Aston Villa | 1 | – | 0 | @ 44% | >>> | 2 | – | 0 |
2015-12-28: | FC Watford | – | Tottenham | 1 | – | 2 | @ 40% | >>> | 1 | – | 2 |
2015-12-28: | WBA | – | Newcastle | 1 | – | 1 | @ 41% | >>> | 1 | – | 0 |
2015-12-28: | Arsenal | – | AFC Bournemouth | 2 | – | 1 | @ 56% | >>> | 2 | – | 0 |
2015-12-28: | Man Utd | – | Chelsea | 1 | – | 1 | @ 34% | >>> | 0 | – | 0 |
2015-12-28: | West Ham | – | Southampton | 1 | – | 1 | @ 38% | >>> | 2 | – | 1 |
2015-12-29: | Leicester | – | Man City | 1 | – | 2 | @ 43% | >>> | 0 | – | 0 |
2015-12-30: | Sunderland | – | Liverpool | 0 | – | 1 | @ 50% | >>> | 0 | – | 1 |
Quota della tendenza per giornata 19: 5 su 10 / 50% (“per caso” sarebbe ø ~33%)
Quota corretta dalla giornata 1: 83 su 190 / 44% (“per caso” sarebbe ø ~33%)
Giornata 18: Premier League 2015/16: pronostici @ z% DMSC* >>> risultati reali:
2015-12-26: | Stoke City | – | Man Utd | 1 | – | 1 | @ 38% | >>> | 2 | – | 0 |
2015-12-26: | Aston Villa | – | West Ham | 1 | – | 1 | @ 33% | >>> | 1 | – | 1 |
2015-12-26: | AFC Bournemouth | – | C.Palace | 1 | – | 1 | @ 30% | >>> | 0 | – | 0 |
2015-12-26: | Chelsea | – | FC Watford | 2 | – | 1 | @ 45% | >>> | 2 | – | 2 |
2015-12-26: | Liverpool | – | Leicester | 1 | – | 1 | @ 28% | >>> | 1 | – | 0 |
2015-12-26: | Man City | – | Sunderland | 2 | – | 0 | @ 68% | >>> | 4 | – | 1 |
2015-12-26: | Swansea | – | WBA | 2 | – | 1 | @ 43% | >>> | 1 | – | 0 |
2015-12-26: | Tottenham | – | Norwich City FC | 2 | – | 0 | @ 58% | >>> | 3 | – | 0 |
2015-12-26: | Newcastle | – | Everton | 0 | – | 0 | @ 41% | >>> | 0 | – | 1 |
2015-12-26: | Southampton | – | Arsenal | 1 | – | 2 | @ 54% | >>> | 4 | – | 0 |
Quota della tendenza per giornata 18: 5 su 10 / 50% (“per caso” sarebbe ø ~33%)
Quota corretta dalla giornata 1: 78 su 180 / 43% (“per caso” sarebbe ø ~33%)
Giornata 17: Premier League 2015/16: pronostici @ z% DMSC* >>> risultati reali:
2015-12-19: | Chelsea | – | Sunderland | 1 | – | 0 | @ 48% | >>> | 3 | – | 1 |
2015-12-19: | Everton | – | Leicester | 1 | – | 1 | @ 39% | >>> | 2 | – | 3 |
2015-12-19: | Man Utd | – | Norwich City FC | 2 | – | 1 | @ 55% | >>> | 1 | – | 2 |
2015-12-19: | Southampton | – | Tottenham | 1 | – | 1 | @ 42% | >>> | 0 | – | 2 |
2015-12-19: | Stoke City | – | C.Palace | 0 | – | 0 | @ 36% | >>> | 1 | – | 2 |
2015-12-19: | WBA | – | AFC Bournemouth | 1 | – | 1 | @ 37% | >>> | 1 | – | 2 |
2015-12-19: | Newcastle | – | Aston Villa | 2 | – | 1 | @ 59% | >>> | 1 | – | 1 |
2015-12-20: | FC Watford | – | Liverpool | 1 | – | 1 | @ 40% | >>> | 3 | – | 0 |
2015-12-20: | Swansea | – | West Ham | 1 | – | 1 | @ 27% | >>> | 0 | – | 0 |
2015-12-21: | Arsenal | – | Man City | 1 | – | 1 | @ 48% | >>> | 2 | – | 1 |
Quota della tendenza per giornata 17: 2 su 10 / 20% (“per caso” sarebbe ø ~33%)
Quota corretta dalla giornata 1: 73 su 170 / 43% (“per caso” sarebbe ø ~33%)
Giornata 16: Premier League 2015/16: pronostici @ z% DMSC* >>> risultati reali:
2015-12-12: | Norwich City FC | – | Everton | 1 | – | 2 | @ 41% | >>> | 1 | – | 1 |
2015-12-12: | C.Palace | – | Southampton | 1 | – | 1 | @ 43% | >>> | 1 | – | 0 |
2015-12-12: | Man City | – | Swansea | 2 | – | 0 | @ 61% | >>> | 2 | – | 1 |
2015-12-12: | Sunderland | – | FC Watford | 1 | – | 2 | @ 42% | >>> | 0 | – | 1 |
2015-12-12: | West Ham | – | Stoke City | 1 | – | 1 | @ 36% | >>> | 0 | – | 0 |
2015-12-12: | AFC Bournemouth | – | Man Utd | 1 | – | 2 | @ 46% | >>> | 2 | – | 1 |
2015-12-13: | Aston Villa | – | Arsenal | 0 | – | 2 | @ 57% | >>> | 0 | – | 2 |
2015-12-13: | Liverpool | – | WBA | 1 | – | 0 | @ 51% | >>> | 2 | – | 2 |
2015-12-13: | Tottenham | – | Newcastle | 2 | – | 1 | @ 52% | >>> | 1 | – | 2 |
2015-12-14: | Leicester | – | Chelsea | 1 | – | 1 | @ 27% | >>> | 2 | – | 1 |
Quota della tendenza per giornata 16: 4 su 10 / 40% (“per caso” sarebbe ø ~33%)
Quota corretta dalla giornata 1: 71 su 160 / 44% (“per caso” sarebbe ø ~33%)
Giornata 15: Premier League 2015/16: pronostici @ z% DMSC* >>> risultati reali:
2015-12-05: | Stoke City | – | Man City | 1 | – | 2 | @ 51% | >>> | 2 | – | 0 |
2015-12-05: | Arsenal | – | Sunderland | 2 | – | 0 | @ 62% | >>> | 3 | – | 1 |
2015-12-05: | Man Utd | – | West Ham | 2 | – | 0 | @ 54% | >>> | 0 | – | 0 |
2015-12-05: | Southampton | – | Aston Villa | 2 | – | 1 | @ 62% | >>> | 1 | – | 1 |
2015-12-05: | Swansea | – | Leicester | 0 | – | 1 | @ 46% | >>> | 0 | – | 3 |
2015-12-05: | FC Watford | – | Norwich City FC | 2 | – | 1 | @ 42% | >>> | 2 | – | 0 |
2015-12-05: | WBA | – | Tottenham | 0 | – | 1 | @ 49% | >>> | 1 | – | 1 |
2015-12-05: | Chelsea | – | AFC Bournemouth | 1 | – | 0 | @ 55% | >>> | 0 | – | 1 |
2015-12-06: | Newcastle | – | Liverpool | 1 | – | 2 | @ 60% | >>> | 2 | – | 0 |
2015-12-07: | Everton | – | C.Palace | 2 | – | 1 | @ 43% | >>> | 1 | – | 1 |
Quota della tendenza per giornata 15: 3 su 10 / 30% (“per caso” sarebbe ø ~33%)
Quota corretta dalla giornata 1: 67 su 150 / 45% (“per caso” sarebbe ø ~33%)
Giornata 14: Premier League 2015/16: pronostici @ z% DMSC* >>> risultati reali:
2015-11-28: | Aston Villa | – | FC Watford | 1 | – | 1 | @ 36% | >>> | 2 | – | 3 |
2015-11-28: | AFC Bournemouth | – | Everton | 1 | – | 2 | @ 51% | >>> | 3 | – | 3 |
2015-11-28: | C.Palace | – | Newcastle | 2 | – | 1 | @ 44% | >>> | 5 | – | 1 |
2015-11-28: | Man City | – | Southampton | 2 | – | 1 | @ 51% | >>> | 3 | – | 1 |
2015-11-28: | Sunderland | – | Stoke City | 0 | – | 1 | @ 47% | >>> | 2 | – | 0 |
2015-11-28: | Leicester | – | Man Utd | 1 | – | 1 | @ 40% | >>> | 1 | – | 1 |
2015-11-29: | Tottenham | – | Chelsea | 2 | – | 1 | @ 48% | >>> | 0 | – | 0 |
2015-11-29: | West Ham | – | WBA | 1 | – | 0 | @ 43% | >>> | 1 | – | 1 |
2015-11-29: | Liverpool | – | Swansea | 2 | – | 1 | @ 52% | >>> | 1 | – | 0 |
2015-11-29: | Norwich City FC | – | Arsenal | 1 | – | 2 | @ 51% | >>> | 1 | – | 1 |
Quota della tendenza per giornata 14: 4 su 10 / 40% (“per caso” sarebbe ø ~33%)
Quota corretta dalla giornata 1: 64 su 140 / 46% (“per caso” sarebbe ø ~33%)
Giornata 13: Premier League 2015/16: pronostici @ z% DMSC* >>> risultati reali:
2015-11-21: | FC Watford | – | Man Utd | 1 | – | 2 | @ 42% | >>> | 1 | – | 2 |
2015-11-21: | Chelsea | – | Norwich City FC | 1 | – | 0 | @ 35% | >>> | 1 | – | 0 |
2015-11-21: | Everton | – | Aston Villa | 2 | – | 0 | @ 63% | >>> | 4 | – | 0 |
2015-11-21: | Newcastle | – | Leicester | 1 | – | 2 | @ 46% | >>> | 0 | – | 3 |
2015-11-21: | Southampton | – | Stoke City | 1 | – | 0 | @ 50% | >>> | 0 | – | 1 |
2015-11-21: | Swansea | – | AFC Bournemouth | 2 | – | 1 | @ 47% | >>> | 2 | – | 2 |
2015-11-21: | WBA | – | Arsenal | 0 | – | 2 | @ 62% | >>> | 2 | – | 1 |
2015-11-21: | Man City | – | Liverpool | 2 | – | 1 | @ 53% | >>> | 1 | – | 4 |
2015-11-22: | Tottenham | – | West Ham | 2 | – | 1 | @ 43% | >>> | 4 | – | 1 |
2015-11-23: | C.Palace | – | Sunderland | 2 | – | 1 | @ 60% | >>> | 0 | – | 1 |
Quota della tendenza per giornata 13: 5 su 10 / 50% (“per caso” sarebbe ø ~33%)
Quota corretta dalla giornata 1: 60 su 130 / 46% (“per caso” sarebbe ø ~33%)
Giornata 12: Premier League 2015/16: pronostici @ z% DMSC* >>> risultati reali:
2015-11-07: | AFC Bournemouth | – | Newcastle | 1 | – | 1 | @ 36% | >>> | 0 | – | 1 |
2015-11-07: | Leicester | – | FC Watford | 2 | – | 1 | @ 46% | >>> | 2 | – | 1 |
2015-11-07: | Man Utd | – | WBA | 2 | – | 0 | @ 58% | >>> | 2 | – | 0 |
2015-11-07: | Norwich City FC | – | Swansea | 1 | – | 1 | @ 35% | >>> | 1 | – | 0 |
2015-11-07: | Sunderland | – | Southampton | 1 | – | 2 | @ 50% | >>> | 0 | – | 1 |
2015-11-07: | West Ham | – | Everton | 1 | – | 1 | @ 38% | >>> | 1 | – | 1 |
2015-11-07: | Stoke City | – | Chelsea | 1 | – | 1 | @ 33% | >>> | 1 | – | 0 |
2015-11-08: | Aston Villa | – | Man City | 0 | – | 2 | @ 67% | >>> | 0 | – | 0 |
2015-11-08: | Arsenal | – | Tottenham | 2 | – | 1 | @ 58% | >>> | 1 | – | 1 |
2015-11-08: | Liverpool | – | C.Palace | 1 | – | 0 | @ 52% | >>> | 1 | – | 2 |
Quota della tendenza per giornata 12: 4 su 10 / 40% (“per caso” sarebbe ø ~33%)
Quota corretta dalla giornata 1: 55 su 120 / 46% (“per caso” sarebbe ø ~33%)
Giornata 11: Premier League 2015/16: pronostici @ z% DMSC* >>> risultati reali:
2015-10-31: | Chelsea | – | Liverpool | 1 | – | 1 | @ 38% | >>> | 1 | – | 3 |
2015-10-31: | C.Palace | – | Man Utd | 1 | – | 2 | @ 45% | >>> | 0 | – | 0 |
2015-10-31: | Man City | – | Norwich City FC | 2 | – | 0 | @ 64% | >>> | 2 | – | 1 |
2015-10-31: | Newcastle | – | Stoke City | 1 | – | 1 | @ 38% | >>> | 0 | – | 0 |
2015-10-31: | Swansea | – | Arsenal | 1 | – | 2 | @ 54% | >>> | 0 | – | 3 |
2015-10-31: | FC Watford | – | West Ham | 1 | – | 2 | @ 44% | >>> | 2 | – | 0 |
2015-10-31: | WBA | – | Leicester | 1 | – | 1 | @ 43% | >>> | 2 | – | 3 |
2015-11-01: | Everton | – | Sunderland | 2 | – | 1 | @ 55% | >>> | 6 | – | 2 |
2015-11-01: | Southampton | – | AFC Bournemouth | 2 | – | 0 | @ 59% | >>> | 2 | – | 0 |
2015-11-02: | Tottenham | – | Aston Villa | 2 | – | 0 | @ 69% | >>> | 3 | – | 1 |
Quota della tendenza per giornata 11: 6 su 10 / 60% (“per caso” sarebbe ø ~33%)
Quota corretta dalla giornata 1: 51 su 110 / 46% (“per caso” sarebbe ø ~33%)
Giornata 10: Premier League 2015/16: pronostici @ z% DMSC* >>> risultati reali:
2015-10-24: | Aston Villa | – | Swansea | 1 | – | 1 | @ 39% | >>> | 1 | – | 2 |
2015-10-24: | Leicester | – | C.Palace | 2 | – | 1 | @ 41% | >>> | 1 | – | 0 |
2015-10-24: | Norwich City FC | – | WBA | 1 | – | 1 | @ 34% | >>> | 0 | – | 1 |
2015-10-24: | Stoke City | – | FC Watford | 2 | – | 1 | @ 48% | >>> | 0 | – | 2 |
2015-10-24: | West Ham | – | Chelsea | 0 | – | 1 | @ 31% | >>> | 2 | – | 1 |
2015-10-24: | Arsenal | – | Everton | 3 | – | 1 | @ 63% | >>> | 2 | – | 1 |
2015-10-25: | Sunderland | – | Newcastle | 1 | – | 1 | @ 37% | >>> | 3 | – | 0 |
2015-10-25: | AFC Bournemouth | – | Tottenham | 0 | – | 1 | @ 45% | >>> | 1 | – | 5 |
2015-10-25: | Man Utd | – | Man City | 2 | – | 2 | @ 42% | >>> | 0 | – | 0 |
2015-10-25: | Liverpool | – | Southampton | 1 | – | 1 | @ 36% | >>> | 1 | – | 1 |
Quota della tendenza per giornata 10: 5 su 10 / 50% (“per caso” sarebbe ø ~33%)
Quota corretta dalla giornata 1: 45 su 100 / 45% (“per caso” sarebbe ø ~33%)
Giornata 9: Premier League 2015/16: pronostici @ z% DMSC* >>> risultati reali:
2015-10-17: | Tottenham | – | Liverpool | 1 | – | 1 | @ 47% | >>> | 0 | – | 0 |
2015-10-17: | Chelsea | – | Aston Villa | 2 | – | 1 | @ 49% | >>> | 2 | – | 0 |
2015-10-17: | C.Palace | – | West Ham | 1 | – | 1 | @ 41% | >>> | 1 | – | 3 |
2015-10-17: | Everton | – | Man Utd | 1 | – | 1 | @ 46% | >>> | 0 | – | 3 |
2015-10-17: | Man City | – | AFC Bournemouth | 2 | – | 0 | @ 60% | >>> | 5 | – | 1 |
2015-10-17: | Southampton | – | Leicester | 2 | – | 1 | @ 48% | >>> | 2 | – | 2 |
2015-10-17: | WBA | – | Sunderland | 2 | – | 1 | @ 50% | >>> | 1 | – | 0 |
2015-10-17: | FC Watford | – | Arsenal | 0 | – | 2 | @ 51% | >>> | 0 | – | 3 |
2015-10-18: | Newcastle | – | Norwich City FC | 1 | – | 1 | @ 42% | >>> | 6 | – | 2 |
2015-10-19: | Swansea | – | Stoke City | 2 | – | 1 | @ 41% | >>> | 0 | – | 1 |
Quota della tendenza per giornata 9: 5 su 10 / 50% (“per caso” sarebbe ø ~33%)
Quota corretta dalla giornata 1: 40 su 90 / 44% (“per caso” sarebbe ø ~33%)
Giornata 8: Premier League 2015/16: pronostici @ z% DMSC* >>> risultati reali:
2015-10-03: | C.Palace | – | WBA | 2 | – | 1 | @ 51% | >>> | 2 | – | 0 |
2015-10-03: | Aston Villa | – | Stoke City | 1 | – | 1 | @ 48% | >>> | 0 | – | 1 |
2015-10-03: | AFC Bournemouth | – | FC Watford | 1 | – | 1 | @ 40% | >>> | 1 | – | 1 |
2015-10-03: | Man City | – | Newcastle | 2 | – | 0 | @ 57% | >>> | 6 | – | 1 |
2015-10-03: | Norwich City FC | – | Leicester | 1 | – | 1 | @ 38% | >>> | 1 | – | 2 |
2015-10-03: | Sunderland | – | West Ham | 1 | – | 2 | @ 47% | >>> | 2 | – | 2 |
2015-10-03: | Chelsea | – | Southampton | 1 | – | 1 | @ 37% | >>> | 1 | – | 3 |
2015-10-04: | Everton | – | Liverpool | 1 | – | 1 | @ 48% | >>> | 1 | – | 1 |
2015-10-04: | Arsenal | – | Man Utd | 2 | – | 2 | @ 42% | >>> | 3 | – | 0 |
2015-10-04: | Swansea | – | Tottenham | 0 | – | 0 | @ 24% | >>> | 2 | – | 2 |
Quota della tendenza per giornata 8: 5 su 10 / 50% (“per caso” sarebbe ø ~33%)
Quota corretta dalla giornata 1: 35 su 80 / 44% (“per caso” sarebbe ø ~33%)
Giornata 7: Premier League 2015/16: pronostici @ z% DMSC* >>> risultati reali:
2015-09-26: | Tottenham | – | Man City | 1 | – | 2 | @ 47% | >>> | 4 | – | 1 |
2015-09-26: | Leicester | – | Arsenal | 1 | – | 2 | @ 43% | >>> | 2 | – | 5 |
2015-09-26: | Liverpool | – | Aston Villa | 2 | – | 1 | @ 57% | >>> | 3 | – | 2 |
2015-09-26: | Man Utd | – | Sunderland | 2 | – | 0 | @ 59% | >>> | 3 | – | 0 |
2015-09-26: | Southampton | – | Swansea | 1 | – | 1 | @ 29% | >>> | 3 | – | 1 |
2015-09-26: | Stoke City | – | AFC Bournemouth | 1 | – | 1 | @ 44% | >>> | 2 | – | 1 |
2015-09-26: | West Ham | – | Norwich City FC | 2 | – | 1 | @ 47% | >>> | 2 | – | 2 |
2015-09-26: | Newcastle | – | Chelsea | 1 | – | 2 | @ 45% | >>> | 2 | – | 2 |
2015-09-27: | FC Watford | – | C.Palace | 1 | – | 1 | @ 36% | >>> | 0 | – | 1 |
2015-09-28: | WBA | – | Everton | 1 | – | 2 | @ 44% | >>> | 2 | – | 3 |
Quota della tendenza per giornata 7: 4 su 10 / 40% (“per caso” sarebbe ø ~33%)
Quota corretta dalla giornata 1: 30 su 70 / 43% (“per caso” sarebbe ø ~33%)
Giornata 6: Premier League 2015/16: pronostici @ z% DMSC* >>> risultati reali:
2015-09-19: | Chelsea | – | Arsenal | 1 | – | 1 | @ 39% | >>> | 2 | – | 0 |
2015-09-19: | Aston Villa | – | WBA | 1 | – | 2 | @ 45% | >>> | 0 | – | 1 |
2015-09-19: | AFC Bournemouth | – | Sunderland | 1 | – | 1 | @ 36% | >>> | 2 | – | 0 |
2015-09-19: | Newcastle | – | FC Watford | 1 | – | 1 | @ 39% | >>> | 1 | – | 2 |
2015-09-19: | Stoke City | – | Leicester | 0 | – | 0 | @ 41% | >>> | 2 | – | 2 |
2015-09-19: | Swansea | – | Everton | 2 | – | 2 | @ 28% | >>> | 0 | – | 0 |
2015-09-19: | Man City | – | West Ham | 2 | – | 1 | @ 54% | >>> | 1 | – | 2 |
2015-09-20: | Tottenham | – | C.Palace | 1 | – | 1 | @ 46% | >>> | 1 | – | 0 |
2015-09-20: | Liverpool | – | Norwich City FC | 1 | – | 0 | @ 44% | >>> | 1 | – | 1 |
2015-09-20: | Southampton | – | Man Utd | 1 | – | 1 | @ 43% | >>> | 2 | – | 3 |
Quota della tendenza per giornata 6: 3 su 10 / 30% (“per caso” sarebbe ø ~33%)
Quota corretta dalla giornata 1: 26 su 60 / 43% (“per caso” sarebbe ø ~33%)
Giornata 5: Premier League 2015/16: pronostici @ z% DMSC* >>> risultati reali:
2015-09-12: | Everton | – | Chelsea | 1 | – | 2 | @ 38% | >>> | 3 | – | 1 |
2015-09-12: | Arsenal | – | Stoke City | 2 | – | 1 | @ 63% | >>> | 2 | – | 0 |
2015-09-12: | C.Palace | – | Man City | 0 | – | 1 | @ 52% | >>> | 0 | – | 1 |
2015-09-12: | Norwich City FC | – | AFC Bournemouth | 1 | – | 2 | @ 38% | >>> | 3 | – | 1 |
2015-09-12: | FC Watford | – | Swansea | 1 | – | 1 | @ 32% | >>> | 1 | – | 0 |
2015-09-12: | WBA | – | Southampton | 1 | – | 2 | @ 46% | >>> | 0 | – | 0 |
2015-09-12: | Man Utd | – | Liverpool | 1 | – | 1 | @ 49% | >>> | 3 | – | 1 |
2015-09-13: | Sunderland | – | Tottenham | 0 | – | 1 | @ 43% | >>> | 0 | – | 1 |
2015-09-13: | Leicester | – | Aston Villa | 2 | – | 1 | @ 53% | >>> | 3 | – | 2 |
2015-09-14: | West Ham | – | Newcastle | 1 | – | 0 | @ 46% | >>> | 2 | – | 0 |
Quota della tendenza per giornata 5: 5 su 10 / 50% (“per caso” sarebbe ø ~33%)
Quota corretta dalla giornata 1: 23 su 50 / 46% (“per caso” sarebbe ø ~33%)
Giornata 4: Premier League 2015/16: pronostici @ z% DMSC* >>> risultati reali:
2015-08-29: | Newcastle | – | Arsenal | 1 | – | 2 | @ 40% | >>> | 0 | – | 1 |
2015-08-29: | Aston Villa | – | Sunderland | 1 | – | 1 | @ 30% | >>> | 2 | – | 2 |
2015-08-29: | AFC Bournemouth | – | Leicester | 1 | – | 1 | @ 34% | >>> | 1 | – | 1 |
2015-08-29: | Chelsea | – | C.Palace | 2 | – | 1 | @ 41% | >>> | 1 | – | 2 |
2015-08-29: | Liverpool | – | West Ham | 1 | – | 0 | @ 52% | >>> | 1 | – | 3 |
2015-08-29: | Man City | – | FC Watford | 3 | – | 1 | @ 54% | >>> | 2 | – | 0 |
2015-08-29: | Stoke City | – | WBA | 1 | – | 1 | @ 47% | >>> | 0 | – | 1 |
2015-08-29: | Tottenham | – | Everton | 1 | – | 1 | @ 41% | >>> | 0 | – | 0 |
2015-08-30: | Southampton | – | Norwich City FC | 0 | – | 0 | @ 36% | >>> | 3 | – | 0 |
2015-08-30: | Swansea | – | Man Utd | 1 | – | 2 | @ 35% | >>> | 2 | – | 1 |
Quota della tendenza per giornata 4: 5 su 10 / 50% (“per caso” sarebbe ø ~33%)
Quota corretta dalla giornata 1: 18 su 40 / 45% (“per caso” sarebbe ø ~33%)
Giornata 3: Premier League 2015/16: pronostici @ z% DMSC* >>> risultati reali:
2015-08-22: | Man Utd | – | Newcastle | 2 | – | 0 | @ 54% | >>> | 0 | – | 0 |
2015-08-22: | C.Palace | – | Aston Villa | 1 | – | 1 | @ 30% | >>> | 2 | – | 1 |
2015-08-22: | Leicester | – | Tottenham | 1 | – | 1 | @ 22% | >>> | 1 | – | 1 |
2015-08-22: | Norwich City FC | – | Stoke City | 1 | – | 1 | @ 31% | >>> | 1 | – | 1 |
2015-08-22: | Sunderland | – | Swansea | 0 | – | 1 | @ 29% | >>> | 1 | – | 1 |
2015-08-22: | West Ham | – | AFC Bournemouth | 2 | – | 1 | @ 36% | >>> | 3 | – | 4 |
2015-08-23: | WBA | – | Chelsea | 1 | – | 2 | @ 32% | >>> | 2 | – | 3 |
2015-08-23: | Everton | – | Man City | 1 | – | 3 | @ 33% | >>> | 0 | – | 2 |
2015-08-23: | FC Watford | – | Southampton | 1 | – | 2 | @ 31% | >>> | 0 | – | 0 |
2015-08-24: | Arsenal | – | Liverpool | 1 | – | 1 | @ 40% | >>> | 0 | – | 0 |
Quota della tendenza per giornata 3: 5 su 10 / 50% (“per caso” sarebbe ø ~33%)
Quota corretta dalla giornata 1: 13 su 30 / 43% (“per caso” sarebbe ø ~33%)
Giornata 2: Premier League 2015/16: pronostici @ z% DMSC* >>> risultati reali:
2015-08-14: | Aston Villa | – | Man Utd | 1 | – | 2 | @ 29% | >>> | 0 | – | 1 |
2015-08-15: | Southampton | – | Everton | 1 | – | 1 | @ 28% | >>> | 0 | – | 3 |
2015-08-15: | Sunderland | – | Norwich City FC | 1 | – | 1 | @ 25% | >>> | 1 | – | 3 |
2015-08-15: | Swansea | – | Newcastle | 1 | – | 1 | @ 29% | >>> | 2 | – | 0 |
2015-08-15: | Tottenham | – | Stoke City | 2 | – | 1 | @ 37% | >>> | 2 | – | 2 |
2015-08-15: | FC Watford | – | WBA | 1 | – | 1 | @ 26% | >>> | 0 | – | 0 |
2015-08-15: | West Ham | – | Leicester | 2 | – | 2 | @ 21% | >>> | 1 | – | 2 |
2015-08-16: | C.Palace | – | Arsenal | 1 | – | 2 | @ 23% | >>> | 1 | – | 2 |
2015-08-16: | Man City | – | Chelsea | 1 | – | 1 | @ 27% | >>> | 3 | – | 0 |
2015-08-17: | Liverpool | – | AFC Bournemouth | 2 | – | 0 | @ 36% | >>> | 1 | – | 0 |
Quota della tendenza per giornata 2: 4 su 10 / 40% (“per caso” sarebbe ø ~33%)
Quota corretta dalla giornata 1: 8 su 20 / 40% (“per caso” sarebbe ø ~33%)
Giornata 1: Premier League 2015/16: pronostici @ z% DMSC* >>> risultati reali:
2015-08-08: | Man Utd | – | Tottenham | 2 | – | 1 | @ 27% | >>> | 1 | – | 0 |
2015-08-08: | AFC Bournemouth | – | Aston Villa | 1 | – | 1 | @ 21% | >>> | 0 | – | 1 |
2015-08-08: | Everton | – | FC Watford | 2 | – | 0 | @ 27% | >>> | 2 | – | 2 |
2015-08-08: | Leicester | – | Sunderland | 1 | – | 1 | @ 19% | >>> | 4 | – | 2 |
2015-08-08: | Norwich City FC | – | C.Palace | 1 | – | 1 | @ 22% | >>> | 1 | – | 3 |
2015-08-08: | Chelsea | – | Swansea | 2 | – | 0 | @ 28% | >>> | 2 | – | 2 |
2015-08-09: | Arsenal | – | West Ham | 2 | – | 1 | @ 27% | >>> | 0 | – | 2 |
2015-08-09: | Newcastle | – | Southampton | 1 | – | 1 | @ 20% | >>> | 2 | – | 2 |
2015-08-09: | Stoke City | – | Liverpool | 1 | – | 2 | @ 21% | >>> | 0 | – | 1 |
2015-08-10: | WBA | – | Man City | 1 | – | 2 | @ 21% | >>> | 0 | – | 3 |
Quota della tendenza per giornata 1: 4 su 10 / 40% (“per caso” sarebbe ø ~33%)
Quota corretta dalla giornata 1: 4 su 10 / 40% (“per caso” sarebbe ø ~33%)
* DMSC (Data.Mining.Soccer-Confidence) è una percentuale di confidenza statistica che procura un’informazione per quanto riguarda la validità statistica di una previsione. Per ulteriori informazioni su questa quota ibrida artificiale puoi consultare la nostra sezione [Nostra analisi].
Software data mining utilizzato: [Data.Mining.Fox® (DMF) di Easy.Data.Mining™]