{"id":2802,"date":"2015-06-24T01:18:34","date_gmt":"2015-06-23T23:18:34","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/dataminingsoccer.com\/en\/?page_id=2802"},"modified":"2015-06-24T01:18:34","modified_gmt":"2015-06-23T23:18:34","slug":"serie-a-2015-2016","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/dataminingsoccer.com\/en\/italy\/predictions-serie-a\/serie-a-2015-2016\/","title":{"rendered":"Serie A 2015\/16"},"content":{"rendered":"

Football Result Predictions using Data Mining<\/h2>

Data mining software used: [Data.Mining.Fox\u00ae (DMF) by Easy.Data.Mining\u2122]<\/a>
Please be aware of our [liability disclaimer]<\/a> regarding the following predictions.<\/p>\n

\"Serie-A\"<\/p>\n

Final tables: Serie A 2015\/16<\/p>\n

Total table:
\"Juventus\"<\/a> \"Napoli\"<\/a> \"Roma\"<\/a> \"Inter<\/a> \"Fiorentina\"<\/a> \"Sassuolo\"<\/a> \"Milan\"<\/a> \"Lazio\"<\/a> \"Chievo\"<\/a> \"Genoa\"<\/a> \"Empoli\"<\/a> \"Torino\"<\/a> \"Atalanta\"<\/a> \"Bologna<\/a> \"Sampdoria\"<\/a> \"Udinese\"<\/a> \"Palermo\"<\/a> \"Carpi<\/a> \"Frosinone<\/a> \"Verona\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Home table:
\"Napoli\"<\/a> \"Juventus\"<\/a> \"Roma\"<\/a> \"Inter<\/a> \"Fiorentina\"<\/a> \"Genoa\"<\/a> \"Lazio\"<\/a> \"Milan\"<\/a> \"Sassuolo\"<\/a> \"Atalanta\"<\/a> \"Chievo\"<\/a> \"Sampdoria\"<\/a> \"Empoli\"<\/a> \"Torino\"<\/a> \"Carpi<\/a> \"Palermo\"<\/a> \"Frosinone<\/a> \"Udinese\"<\/a> \"Bologna<\/a> \"Verona\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Away table:
\"Juventus\"<\/a> \"Roma\"<\/a> \"Napoli\"<\/a> \"Sassuolo\"<\/a> \"Fiorentina\"<\/a> \"Inter<\/a> \"Milan\"<\/a> \"Bologna<\/a> \"Torino\"<\/a> \"Lazio\"<\/a> \"Chievo\"<\/a> \"Empoli\"<\/a> \"Udinese\"<\/a> \"Palermo\"<\/a> \"Atalanta\"<\/a> \"Carpi<\/a> \"Genoa\"<\/a> \"Sampdoria\"<\/a> \"Verona\"<\/a> \"Frosinone<\/a><\/p>\n

\"Serie-A\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Matchday 38<\/b>: Serie A 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2016-05-14:<\/td>\nJuventus<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSampdoria<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 65%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n5<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-05-14:<\/td>\nNapoli<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nFrosinone Calcio<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 68%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n4<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-05-14:<\/td>\nSassuolo<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nInter Milan<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 40%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-05-14:<\/td>\nMilan<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nRoma<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 42%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-05-15:<\/td>\nGenoa<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nAtalanta<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 51%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-05-15:<\/td>\nChievo<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nBologna FC<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 36%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-05-15:<\/td>\nEmpoli<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nTorino<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 43%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-05-15:<\/td>\nUdinese<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nCarpi FC<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 40%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-05-15:<\/td>\nLazio<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nFiorentina<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 50%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-05-15:<\/td>\nPalermo<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nVerona<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 45%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 38<\/b>: 5 out of 10 \/ 50%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 183 out of 380 \/ 48%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

Check here for the entire list of [statistics by team]<\/a> so far, and here for the [hit rates by various prediction categories]<\/a>.<\/p>\n

* DMSC (Data.Mining.Soccer-Confidence)<\/b> is a percentage of statistical confidence which provides insight about the statistical validity of a prediction. For more information about this artificial hybrid ratio check our section [Our analysis]<\/a>.<\/p>\n

\"Serie-A\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 37<\/b>: Serie A 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2016-05-07:<\/td>\nInter Milan<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nEmpoli<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 58%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-05-07:<\/td>\nBologna FC<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nMilan<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 37%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-05-08:<\/td>\nRoma<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nChievo<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 63%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-05-08:<\/td>\nSampdoria<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nGenoa<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 46%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-05-08:<\/td>\nCarpi FC<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nLazio<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 37%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-05-08:<\/td>\nFiorentina<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nPalermo<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 52%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-05-08:<\/td>\nFrosinone Calcio<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSassuolo<\/b><\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n@ 45%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-05-08:<\/td>\nAtalanta<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nUdinese<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n@ 40%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-05-08:<\/td>\nVerona<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nJuventus<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 65%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-05-08:<\/td>\nTorino<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nNapoli<\/b><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 46%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 37<\/b>: 5 out of 10 \/ 50%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 178 out of 370 \/ 48%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Serie-A\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 36<\/b>: Serie A 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2016-04-30:<\/td>\nUdinese<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nTorino<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 40%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n5<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-30:<\/td>\nChievo<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nFiorentina<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 41%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-05-01:<\/td>\nJuventus<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nCarpi FC<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n@ 66%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-05-01:<\/td>\nEmpoli<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nBologna FC<\/b><\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n@ 35%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-05-01:<\/td>\nMilan<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nFrosinone Calcio<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 57%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-05-01:<\/td>\nSassuolo<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nVerona<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 53%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-05-01:<\/td>\nPalermo<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSampdoria<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 38%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-05-01:<\/td>\nLazio<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nInter Milan<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 40%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-05-02:<\/td>\nGenoa<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nRoma<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 46%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-05-02:<\/td>\nNapoli<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nAtalanta<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 59%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 36<\/b>: 6 out of 10 \/ 60%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 173 out of 360 \/ 48%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Serie-A\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 35<\/b>: Serie A 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2016-04-23:<\/td>\nInter Milan<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nUdinese<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 58%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-24:<\/td>\nFrosinone Calcio<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nPalermo<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 41%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-24:<\/td>\nAtalanta<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nChievo<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 38%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-24:<\/td>\nBologna FC<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nGenoa<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 35%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-24:<\/td>\nSampdoria<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nLazio<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 43%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-24:<\/td>\nTorino<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSassuolo<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 38%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-24:<\/td>\nFiorentina<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nJuventus<\/b><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 51%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-25:<\/td>\nRoma<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nNapoli<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 46%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-25:<\/td>\nVerona<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nMilan<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 45%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-25:<\/td>\nCarpi FC<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nEmpoli<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 42%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 35<\/b>: 3 out of 10 \/ 30%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 167 out of 350 \/ 48%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Serie-A\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 34<\/b>: Serie A 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2016-04-19:<\/td>\nNapoli<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nBologna FC<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 58%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n6<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-20:<\/td>\nSassuolo<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSampdoria<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 39%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-20:<\/td>\nPalermo<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nAtalanta<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 40%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-20:<\/td>\nUdinese<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nFiorentina<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 40%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-20:<\/td>\nChievo<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nFrosinone Calcio<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 49%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n5<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-20:<\/td>\nEmpoli<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nVerona<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n@ 45%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-20:<\/td>\nGenoa<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nInter Milan<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 39%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-20:<\/td>\nJuventus<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nLazio<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 65%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-20:<\/td>\nRoma<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nTorino<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 56%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-21:<\/td>\nMilan<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nCarpi FC<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 53%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 34<\/b>: 7 out of 10 \/ 70%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 164 out of 340 \/ 48%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Serie-A\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 33<\/b>: Serie A 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2016-04-16:<\/td>\nBologna FC<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nTorino<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 40%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-16:<\/td>\nCarpi FC<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nGenoa<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 41%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n4<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-16:<\/td>\nInter Milan<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nNapoli<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 50%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-17:<\/td>\nAtalanta<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nRoma<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 50%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-17:<\/td>\nUdinese<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nChievo<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 33%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-17:<\/td>\nVerona<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nFrosinone Calcio<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 45%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-17:<\/td>\nJuventus<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nPalermo<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 70%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n4<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-17:<\/td>\nFiorentina<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSassuolo<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 40%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-17:<\/td>\nLazio<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nEmpoli<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n@ 53%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-17:<\/td>\nSampdoria<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nMilan<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 35%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 33<\/b>: 3 out of 10 \/ 30%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 157 out of 330 \/ 48%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Serie-A\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 32<\/b>: Serie A 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2016-04-09:<\/td>\nFrosinone Calcio<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nInter Milan<\/b><\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n@ 46%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-09:<\/td>\nChievo<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nCarpi FC<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 43%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-09:<\/td>\nSassuolo<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nGenoa<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 47%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-09:<\/td>\nMilan<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nJuventus<\/b><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 48%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-10:<\/td>\nEmpoli<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nFiorentina<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 45%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-10:<\/td>\nTorino<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nAtalanta<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 40%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-10:<\/td>\nNapoli<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nVerona<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 62%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-10:<\/td>\nSampdoria<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nUdinese<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 38%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-10:<\/td>\nPalermo<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nLazio<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 43%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-11:<\/td>\nRoma<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nBologna FC<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 62%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 32<\/b>: 5 out of 10 \/ 50%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 154 out of 320 \/ 48%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Serie-A\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 31<\/b>: Serie A 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2016-04-02:<\/td>\nCarpi FC<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSassuolo<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 37%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-02:<\/td>\nJuventus<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nEmpoli<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 67%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-03:<\/td>\nUdinese<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nNapoli<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 56%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-03:<\/td>\nGenoa<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nFrosinone Calcio<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 56%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n4<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-03:<\/td>\nAtalanta<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nMilan<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 37%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-03:<\/td>\nChievo<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nPalermo<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 43%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-03:<\/td>\nLazio<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nRoma<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 42%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-03:<\/td>\nFiorentina<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSampdoria<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 57%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-03:<\/td>\nInter Milan<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nTorino<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 61%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-04:<\/td>\nBologna FC<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nVerona<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 45%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 31<\/b>: 4 out of 10 \/ 40%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 149 out of 310 \/ 48%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Serie-A\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 30<\/b>: Serie A 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2016-03-19:<\/td>\nEmpoli<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nPalermo<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 44%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-19:<\/td>\nRoma<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nInter Milan<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 54%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-20:<\/td>\nAtalanta<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nBologna FC<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 34%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-20:<\/td>\nVerona<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nCarpi FC<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 42%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-20:<\/td>\nSampdoria<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nChievo<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 46%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-20:<\/td>\nFrosinone Calcio<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nFiorentina<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 48%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-20:<\/td>\nTorino<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nJuventus<\/b><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 63%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-20:<\/td>\nSassuolo<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nUdinese<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 49%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-20:<\/td>\nNapoli<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nGenoa<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 61%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-20:<\/td>\nMilan<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nLazio<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 47%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 30<\/b>: 2 out of 10 \/ 20%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 145 out of 300 \/ 48%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Serie-A\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 29<\/b>: Serie A 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2016-03-11:<\/td>\nJuventus<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSassuolo<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 57%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-12:<\/td>\nEmpoli<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSampdoria<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n@ 35%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-12:<\/td>\nInter Milan<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nBologna FC<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 48%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-13:<\/td>\nChievo<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nMilan<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 37%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-13:<\/td>\nCarpi FC<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nFrosinone Calcio<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n@ 43%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-13:<\/td>\nFiorentina<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nVerona<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 64%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-13:<\/td>\nUdinese<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nRoma<\/b><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 52%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-13:<\/td>\nGenoa<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nTorino<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 46%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-13:<\/td>\nLazio<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nAtalanta<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 58%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-13:<\/td>\nPalermo<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nNapoli<\/b><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 58%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 29<\/b>: 8 out of 10 \/ 80%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 143 out of 290 \/ 49%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Serie-A\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 28<\/b>: Serie A 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2016-03-04:<\/td>\nRoma<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nFiorentina<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 50%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n4<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-05:<\/td>\nVerona<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSampdoria<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 35%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-05:<\/td>\nNapoli<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nChievo<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 62%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-06:<\/td>\nTorino<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nLazio<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n@ 42%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-06:<\/td>\nBologna FC<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nCarpi FC<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 47%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-06:<\/td>\nGenoa<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nEmpoli<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 44%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-06:<\/td>\nAtalanta<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nJuventus<\/b><\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n@ 64%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-06:<\/td>\nSassuolo<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nMilan<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 37%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-06:<\/td>\nFrosinone Calcio<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nUdinese<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 40%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-06:<\/td>\nInter Milan<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nPalermo<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 59%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 28<\/b>: 6 out of 10 \/ 60%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 135 out of 280 \/ 48%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Serie-A\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 27<\/b>: Serie A 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2016-02-28:<\/td>\nEmpoli<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nRoma<\/b><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 50%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-28:<\/td>\nMilan<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nTorino<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 54%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-28:<\/td>\nPalermo<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nBologna FC<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 40%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-28:<\/td>\nCarpi FC<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nAtalanta<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 42%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-28:<\/td>\nSampdoria<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nFrosinone Calcio<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 48%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-28:<\/td>\nChievo<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nGenoa<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 37%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-28:<\/td>\nUdinese<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nVerona<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 41%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-28:<\/td>\nJuventus<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nInter Milan<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 56%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-29:<\/td>\nFiorentina<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nNapoli<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n@ 43%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-29:<\/td>\nLazio<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSassuolo<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 48%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 27<\/b>: 6 out of 10 \/ 60%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 129 out of 270 \/ 48%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Serie-A\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 26<\/b>: Serie A 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2016-02-19:<\/td>\nBologna FC<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nJuventus<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 52%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-20:<\/td>\nVerona<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nChievo<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 34%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-20:<\/td>\nInter Milan<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSampdoria<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 58%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-21:<\/td>\nTorino<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nCarpi FC<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 57%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-21:<\/td>\nSassuolo<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nEmpoli<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 40%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-21:<\/td>\nAtalanta<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nFiorentina<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 44%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-21:<\/td>\nGenoa<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nUdinese<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n@ 39%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-21:<\/td>\nFrosinone Calcio<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nLazio<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 46%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-21:<\/td>\nRoma<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nPalermo<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 65%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n5<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-22:<\/td>\nNapoli<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nMilan<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 53%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 26<\/b>: 5 out of 10 \/ 50%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 123 out of 260 \/ 47%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Serie-A\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 25<\/b>: Serie A 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2016-02-11:<\/td>\nLazio<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nVerona<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 56%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n5<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-12:<\/td>\nCarpi FC<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nRoma<\/b><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 48%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-13:<\/td>\nEmpoli<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nFrosinone Calcio<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 57%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-13:<\/td>\nChievo<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSassuolo<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n@ 42%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-13:<\/td>\nJuventus<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nNapoli<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 47%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-14:<\/td>\nMilan<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nGenoa<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 55%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-14:<\/td>\nSampdoria<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nAtalanta<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 45%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-14:<\/td>\nUdinese<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nBologna FC<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 40%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-14:<\/td>\nPalermo<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nTorino<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 42%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-14:<\/td>\nFiorentina<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nInter Milan<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n@ 45%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 25<\/b>: 6 out of 10 \/ 60%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 118 out of 250 \/ 47%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Serie-A\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 24<\/b>: Serie A 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2016-02-06:<\/td>\nBologna FC<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nFiorentina<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 41%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-06:<\/td>\nGenoa<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nLazio<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 41%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-07:<\/td>\nVerona<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nInter Milan<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 46%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-07:<\/td>\nNapoli<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nCarpi FC<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 68%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-07:<\/td>\nTorino<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nChievo<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 47%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-07:<\/td>\nFrosinone Calcio<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nJuventus<\/b><\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n@ 66%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-07:<\/td>\nSassuolo<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nPalermo<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 44%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-07:<\/td>\nMilan<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nUdinese<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 62%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-07:<\/td>\nAtalanta<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nEmpoli<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 36%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-07:<\/td>\nRoma<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSampdoria<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n@ 62%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 24<\/b>: 5 out of 10 \/ 50%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 112 out of 240 \/ 47%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Serie-A\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 23<\/b>: Serie A 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2016-02-02:<\/td>\nSassuolo<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nRoma<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 42%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-03:<\/td>\nFrosinone Calcio<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nBologna FC<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 46%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-03:<\/td>\nVerona<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nAtalanta<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 44%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-03:<\/td>\nFiorentina<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nCarpi FC<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 59%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-03:<\/td>\nInter Milan<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nChievo<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n@ 48%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-03:<\/td>\nJuventus<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nGenoa<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 66%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-03:<\/td>\nPalermo<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nMilan<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 41%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-03:<\/td>\nLazio<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nNapoli<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 46%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-03:<\/td>\nSampdoria<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nTorino<\/b><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 39%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-03:<\/td>\nEmpoli<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nUdinese<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 42%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 23<\/b>: 6 out of 10 \/ 60%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 107 out of 230 \/ 47%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Serie-A\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 22<\/b>: Serie A 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2016-01-30:<\/td>\nCarpi FC<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nPalermo<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n@ 40%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-01-30:<\/td>\nAtalanta<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSassuolo<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n@ 37%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-01-30:<\/td>\nRoma<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nFrosinone Calcio<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 61%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-01-31:<\/td>\nChievo<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nJuventus<\/b><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 56%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-01-31:<\/td>\nNapoli<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nEmpoli<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 60%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n5<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-01-31:<\/td>\nGenoa<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nFiorentina<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 38%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-01-31:<\/td>\nTorino<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nVerona<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 50%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-01-31:<\/td>\nUdinese<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nLazio<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 31%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-01-31:<\/td>\nBologna FC<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSampdoria<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 40%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-01-31:<\/td>\nMilan<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nInter Milan<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 43%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 22<\/b>: 8 out of 10 \/ 80%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 101 out of 220 \/ 46%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Serie-A\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 21<\/b>: Serie A 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2016-01-23:<\/td>\nFrosinone Calcio<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nAtalanta<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 40%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-01-23:<\/td>\nEmpoli<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nMilan<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 39%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-01-24:<\/td>\nFiorentina<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nTorino<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 52%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-01-24:<\/td>\nSassuolo<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nBologna FC<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 36%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-01-24:<\/td>\nInter Milan<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nCarpi FC<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 57%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-01-24:<\/td>\nLazio<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nChievo<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 46%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n4<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-01-24:<\/td>\nVerona<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nGenoa<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 42%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-01-24:<\/td>\nSampdoria<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nNapoli<\/b><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 53%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-01-24:<\/td>\nPalermo<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nUdinese<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 43%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n4<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-01-24:<\/td>\nJuventus<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nRoma<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 53%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 21<\/b>: 5 out of 10 \/ 50%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 93 out of 210 \/ 44%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Serie-A\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 20<\/b>: Serie A 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2016-01-16:<\/td>\nAtalanta<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nInter Milan<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 50%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-01-16:<\/td>\nTorino<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nFrosinone Calcio<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 58%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n4<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-01-16:<\/td>\nNapoli<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSassuolo<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 60%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-01-17:<\/td>\nGenoa<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nPalermo<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 39%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n4<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-01-17:<\/td>\nChievo<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nEmpoli<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n@ 38%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-01-17:<\/td>\nRoma<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nVerona<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 67%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-01-17:<\/td>\nUdinese<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nJuventus<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 61%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-01-17:<\/td>\nBologna FC<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nLazio<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 40%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-01-17:<\/td>\nCarpi FC<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSampdoria<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 38%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-01-17:<\/td>\nMilan<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nFiorentina<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 41%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 20<\/b>: 4 out of 10 \/ 40%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 88 out of 200 \/ 44%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Serie-A\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 19<\/b>: Serie A 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2016-01-09:<\/td>\nCarpi FC<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nUdinese<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 47%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-01-09:<\/td>\nFiorentina<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nLazio<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 56%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-01-09:<\/td>\nRoma<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nMilan<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 47%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-01-10:<\/td>\nInter Milan<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSassuolo<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 57%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-01-10:<\/td>\nAtalanta<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nGenoa<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 45%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-01-10:<\/td>\nBologna FC<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nChievo<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 37%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-01-10:<\/td>\nFrosinone Calcio<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nNapoli<\/b><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 61%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n5<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-01-10:<\/td>\nVerona<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nPalermo<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 42%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-01-10:<\/td>\nTorino<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nEmpoli<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 35%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-01-10:<\/td>\nSampdoria<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nJuventus<\/b><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 54%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 19<\/b>: 2 out of 10 \/ 20%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 84 out of 190 \/ 44%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Serie-A\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 18<\/b>: Serie A 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2016-01-05:<\/td>\nGenoa<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSampdoria<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 34%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-01-06:<\/td>\nUdinese<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nAtalanta<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 42%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-01-06:<\/td>\nChievo<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nRoma<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 41%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-01-06:<\/td>\nJuventus<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nVerona<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 71%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-01-06:<\/td>\nLazio<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nCarpi FC<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 65%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-01-06:<\/td>\nMilan<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nBologna FC<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 54%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-01-06:<\/td>\nPalermo<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nFiorentina<\/b><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 51%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-01-06:<\/td>\nSassuolo<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nFrosinone Calcio<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 60%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-01-06:<\/td>\nEmpoli<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nInter Milan<\/b><\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n@ 38%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-01-06:<\/td>\nNapoli<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nTorino<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n@ 64%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 18<\/b>: 4 out of 10 \/ 40%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 82 out of 180 \/ 46%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Serie-A\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 17<\/b>: Serie A 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2015-12-19:<\/td>\nBologna FC<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nEmpoli<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 39%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-20:<\/td>\nCarpi FC<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nJuventus<\/b><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 64%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-20:<\/td>\nAtalanta<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nNapoli<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 44%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-20:<\/td>\nFiorentina<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nChievo<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n@ 55%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-20:<\/td>\nVerona<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSassuolo<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 45%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-20:<\/td>\nRoma<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nGenoa<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n@ 58%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-20:<\/td>\nFrosinone Calcio<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nMilan<\/b><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 45%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-20:<\/td>\nSampdoria<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nPalermo<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 38%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-20:<\/td>\nTorino<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nUdinese<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 46%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-20:<\/td>\nInter Milan<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nLazio<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 62%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 17<\/b>: 5 out of 10 \/ 50%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 78 out of 170 \/ 46%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Serie-A\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 16<\/b>: Serie A 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2015-12-12:<\/td>\nGenoa<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nBologna FC<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 35%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-12:<\/td>\nPalermo<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nFrosinone Calcio<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 44%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n4<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-01-20:<\/td>\nSassuolo<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nTorino<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n@ 39%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-12:<\/td>\nUdinese<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nInter Milan<\/b><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 51%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-13:<\/td>\nChievo<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nAtalanta<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 39%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-13:<\/td>\nEmpoli<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nCarpi FC<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 51%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-13:<\/td>\nMilan<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nVerona<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 65%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-13:<\/td>\nNapoli<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nRoma<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 48%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-13:<\/td>\nJuventus<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nFiorentina<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 51%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-14:<\/td>\nLazio<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSampdoria<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 51%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 16<\/b>: 5 out of 10 \/ 50%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 73 out of 160 \/ 46%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Serie-A\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 15<\/b>: Serie A 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2015-12-04:<\/td>\nLazio<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nJuventus<\/b><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 48%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-05:<\/td>\nTorino<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nRoma<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n@ 35%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-05:<\/td>\nInter Milan<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nGenoa<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 60%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-06:<\/td>\nBologna FC<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nNapoli<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 59%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-06:<\/td>\nAtalanta<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nPalermo<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 51%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-06:<\/td>\nFiorentina<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nUdinese<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 57%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-06:<\/td>\nFrosinone Calcio<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nChievo<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 35%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-06:<\/td>\nVerona<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nEmpoli<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 42%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-06:<\/td>\nSampdoria<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSassuolo<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 33%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-06:<\/td>\nCarpi FC<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nMilan<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 49%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 15<\/b>: 6 out of 10 \/ 60%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 68 out of 150 \/ 45%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Serie-A\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 14<\/b>: Serie A 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2015-11-28:<\/td>\nTorino<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nBologna FC<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 33%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-28:<\/td>\nMilan<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSampdoria<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 55%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n4<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-29:<\/td>\nChievo<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nUdinese<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 42%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-29:<\/td>\nFrosinone Calcio<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nVerona<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 43%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-29:<\/td>\nGenoa<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nCarpi FC<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 63%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-29:<\/td>\nRoma<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nAtalanta<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 65%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-29:<\/td>\nEmpoli<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nLazio<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 33%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-29:<\/td>\nPalermo<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nJuventus<\/b><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 51%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-30:<\/td>\nSassuolo<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nFiorentina<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 41%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-30:<\/td>\nNapoli<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nInter Milan<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 48%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 14<\/b>: 3 out of 10 \/ 30%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 62 out of 140 \/ 44%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Serie-A\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 13<\/b>: Serie A 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2015-11-21:<\/td>\nBologna FC<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nRoma<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 43%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-21:<\/td>\nJuventus<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nMilan<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n@ 43%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-22:<\/td>\nUdinese<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSampdoria<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 45%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-22:<\/td>\nAtalanta<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nTorino<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 47%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-22:<\/td>\nCarpi FC<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nChievo<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 44%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-22:<\/td>\nFiorentina<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nEmpoli<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 64%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-22:<\/td>\nGenoa<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSassuolo<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 33%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-22:<\/td>\nVerona<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nNapoli<\/b><\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n@ 62%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-22:<\/td>\nLazio<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nPalermo<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 56%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-22:<\/td>\nInter Milan<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nFrosinone Calcio<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 69%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n4<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 13<\/b>: 3 out of 10 \/ 30%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 59 out of 130 \/ 45%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Serie-A\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 12<\/b>: Serie A 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2015-11-07:<\/td>\nVerona<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nBologna FC<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 39%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-07:<\/td>\nMilan<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nAtalanta<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 61%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-08:<\/td>\nTorino<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nInter Milan<\/b><\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n@ 44%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-08:<\/td>\nEmpoli<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nJuventus<\/b><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 36%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-08:<\/td>\nFrosinone Calcio<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nGenoa<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 34%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-08:<\/td>\nPalermo<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nChievo<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 42%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-08:<\/td>\nRoma<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nLazio<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 54%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-08:<\/td>\nSassuolo<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nCarpi FC<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n@ 59%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-08:<\/td>\nNapoli<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nUdinese<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 64%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-08:<\/td>\nSampdoria<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nFiorentina<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 42%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 12<\/b>: 7 out of 10 \/ 70%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 56 out of 120 \/ 47%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Serie-A\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 11<\/b>: Serie A 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2015-10-31:<\/td>\nJuventus<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nTorino<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n@ 47%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-31:<\/td>\nInter Milan<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nRoma<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 40%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-01:<\/td>\nFiorentina<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nFrosinone Calcio<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 63%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n4<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-01:<\/td>\nBologna FC<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nAtalanta<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 45%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-01:<\/td>\nCarpi FC<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nVerona<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 47%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-01:<\/td>\nGenoa<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nNapoli<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 46%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-01:<\/td>\nUdinese<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSassuolo<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 36%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-01:<\/td>\nLazio<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nMilan<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 48%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-02:<\/td>\nChievo<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSampdoria<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n@ 31%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-02:<\/td>\nPalermo<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nEmpoli<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 38%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 11<\/b>: 5 out of 10 \/ 50%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 49 out of 110 \/ 45%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Serie-A\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 10<\/b>: Serie A 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2015-10-27:<\/td>\nBologna FC<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nInter Milan<\/b><\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n@ 52%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-28:<\/td>\nAtalanta<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nLazio<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 50%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-28:<\/td>\nFrosinone Calcio<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nCarpi FC<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 43%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-28:<\/td>\nVerona<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nFiorentina<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 49%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-28:<\/td>\nMilan<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nChievo<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n@ 52%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-28:<\/td>\nNapoli<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nPalermo<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n@ 60%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-28:<\/td>\nRoma<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nUdinese<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 62%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-28:<\/td>\nSassuolo<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nJuventus<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 42%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-28:<\/td>\nTorino<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nGenoa<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 45%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-29:<\/td>\nSampdoria<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nEmpoli<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 44%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 10<\/b>: 5 out of 10 \/ 50%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 44 out of 100 \/ 44%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Serie-A\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 9<\/b>: Serie A 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2015-10-24:<\/td>\nEmpoli<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nGenoa<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 31%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-24:<\/td>\nCarpi FC<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nBologna FC<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 46%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-24:<\/td>\nPalermo<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nInter Milan<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 49%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-25:<\/td>\nSampdoria<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nVerona<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 47%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n4<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-25:<\/td>\nJuventus<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nAtalanta<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 54%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-25:<\/td>\nMilan<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSassuolo<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n@ 41%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-25:<\/td>\nUdinese<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nFrosinone Calcio<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n@ 45%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-25:<\/td>\nFiorentina<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nRoma<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 38%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-25:<\/td>\nLazio<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nTorino<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 48%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-25:<\/td>\nChievo<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nNapoli<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 42%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 9<\/b>: 6 out of 10 \/ 60%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 39 out of 90 \/ 43%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Serie-A\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 8<\/b>: Serie A 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2015-10-17:<\/td>\nRoma<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nEmpoli<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 55%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-17:<\/td>\nTorino<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nMilan<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 42%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-18:<\/td>\nBologna FC<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nPalermo<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 45%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-18:<\/td>\nAtalanta<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nCarpi FC<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 58%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-18:<\/td>\nFrosinone Calcio<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSampdoria<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 41%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-18:<\/td>\nGenoa<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nChievo<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 41%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-18:<\/td>\nVerona<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nUdinese<\/b><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 40%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-18:<\/td>\nNapoli<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nFiorentina<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 38%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-18:<\/td>\nSassuolo<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nLazio<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 44%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-18:<\/td>\nInter Milan<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nJuventus<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 41%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 8<\/b>: 4 out of 10 \/ 40%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 33 out of 80 \/ 41%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Serie-A\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 7<\/b>: Serie A 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2015-10-03:<\/td>\nCarpi FC<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nTorino<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 65%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-03:<\/td>\nChievo<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nVerona<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 48%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-04:<\/td>\nEmpoli<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSassuolo<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 43%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-04:<\/td>\nPalermo<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nRoma<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 42%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-04:<\/td>\nSampdoria<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nInter Milan<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 39%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-04:<\/td>\nUdinese<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nGenoa<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n@ 36%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-04:<\/td>\nJuventus<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nBologna FC<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 47%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-04:<\/td>\nLazio<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nFrosinone Calcio<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n@ 63%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-04:<\/td>\nFiorentina<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nAtalanta<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 59%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-04:<\/td>\nMilan<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nNapoli<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 37%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 7<\/b>: 5 out of 10 \/ 50%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 29 out of 70 \/ 41%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Serie-A\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 6<\/b>: Serie A 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2015-09-26:<\/td>\nRoma<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nCarpi FC<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 54%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n5<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-26:<\/td>\nNapoli<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nJuventus<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 32%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-27:<\/td>\nGenoa<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nMilan<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 44%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-27:<\/td>\nBologna FC<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nUdinese<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 40%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-27:<\/td>\nVerona<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nLazio<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n@ 46%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-27:<\/td>\nSassuolo<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nChievo<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n@ 40%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-27:<\/td>\nTorino<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nPalermo<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 41%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-27:<\/td>\nInter Milan<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nFiorentina<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 56%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-28:<\/td>\nFrosinone Calcio<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nEmpoli<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 31%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-28:<\/td>\nAtalanta<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSampdoria<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 39%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 6<\/b>: 4 out of 10 \/ 40%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 24 out of 60 \/ 40%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Serie-A\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 5<\/b>: Serie A 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2015-09-22:<\/td>\nUdinese<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nMilan<\/b><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 40%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-23:<\/td>\nCarpi FC<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nNapoli<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 64%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-23:<\/td>\nChievo<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nTorino<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 42%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-23:<\/td>\nFiorentina<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nBologna FC<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 60%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-23:<\/td>\nInter Milan<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nVerona<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n@ 62%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-23:<\/td>\nJuventus<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nFrosinone Calcio<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 58%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-23:<\/td>\nLazio<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nGenoa<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 53%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-23:<\/td>\nPalermo<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSassuolo<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 33%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-23:<\/td>\nSampdoria<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nRoma<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 40%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-24:<\/td>\nEmpoli<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nAtalanta<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 48%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 5<\/b>: 4 out of 10 \/ 40%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 20 out of 50 \/ 40%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Serie-A\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 4<\/b>: Serie A 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2015-09-19:<\/td>\nUdinese<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nEmpoli<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 40%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-19:<\/td>\nMilan<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nPalermo<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 32%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-20:<\/td>\nChievo<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nInter Milan<\/b><\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n@ 33%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-20:<\/td>\nAtalanta<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nVerona<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n@ 40%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-20:<\/td>\nBologna FC<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nFrosinone Calcio<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 49%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-20:<\/td>\nGenoa<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nJuventus<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 30%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-20:<\/td>\nRoma<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSassuolo<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 43%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-20:<\/td>\nTorino<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSampdoria<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 35%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-20:<\/td>\nCarpi FC<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nFiorentina<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 38%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-20:<\/td>\nNapoli<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nLazio<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 38%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n5<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 4<\/b>: 5 out of 10 \/ 50%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 16 out of 40 \/ 40%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Serie-A\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 3<\/b>: Serie A 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2015-09-13:<\/td>\nEmpoli<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nNapoli<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 31%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-12:<\/td>\nFiorentina<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nGenoa<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 31%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-12:<\/td>\nFrosinone Calcio<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nRoma<\/b><\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n@ 52%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-13:<\/td>\nVerona<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nTorino<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 33%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-13:<\/td>\nInter Milan<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nMilan<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 38%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-12:<\/td>\nJuventus<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nChievo<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 33%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-13:<\/td>\nLazio<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nUdinese<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 27%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-13:<\/td>\nPalermo<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nCarpi FC<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 37%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-13:<\/td>\nSampdoria<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nBologna FC<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 37%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-13:<\/td>\nSassuolo<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nAtalanta<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 34%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 3<\/b>: 4 out of 10 \/ 40%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 11 out of 30 \/ 37%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Serie-A\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 2<\/b>: Serie A 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2015-08-29:<\/td>\nBologna FC<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSassuolo<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 23%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-08-29:<\/td>\nMilan<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nEmpoli<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 32%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-08-30:<\/td>\nRoma<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nJuventus<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 19%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-08-30:<\/td>\nAtalanta<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nFrosinone Calcio<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 41%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-08-30:<\/td>\nCarpi FC<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nInter Milan<\/b><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 48%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-08-30:<\/td>\nChievo<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nLazio<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 27%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n4<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-08-30:<\/td>\nGenoa<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nVerona<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 23%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-08-30:<\/td>\nNapoli<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSampdoria<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 37%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-08-30:<\/td>\nTorino<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nFiorentina<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 24%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-08-30:<\/td>\nUdinese<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nPalermo<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 26%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 2<\/b>: 3 out of 10 \/ 30%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 7 out of 20 \/ 35%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Serie-A\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 1<\/b>: Serie A 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2015-08-22:<\/td>\nVerona<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nRoma<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 21%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-08-22:<\/td>\nLazio<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nBologna FC<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 32%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-08-23:<\/td>\nJuventus<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nUdinese<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 32%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-08-23:<\/td>\nEmpoli<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nChievo<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 15%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-08-23:<\/td>\nFiorentina<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nMilan<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 15%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-08-23:<\/td>\nFrosinone Calcio<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nTorino<\/b><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 20%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-08-23:<\/td>\nInter Milan<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nAtalanta<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 26%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-08-23:<\/td>\nPalermo<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nGenoa<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 14%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-08-23:<\/td>\nSampdoria<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nCarpi FC<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 25%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n5<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-08-23:<\/td>\nSassuolo<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nNapoli<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 21%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 1<\/b>: 4 out of 10 \/ 40%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 4 out of 10 \/ 40%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

* DMSC (Data.Mining.Soccer-Confidence)<\/b> is a percentage of statistical confidence which provides insight about the statistical validity of a prediction. For more information about this artificial hybrid ratio check our section [Our analysis]<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Data mining software used: [Data.Mining.Fox\u00ae (DMF) by Easy.Data.Mining\u2122]<\/a><\/p>\n

\"Data-Mining-Soccer-top-of-page\"<\/a> \"Data-Mining-Soccer-football-result-prediction\"<\/a> \"DataMiningSoccer<\/a> \"DataMiningSoccer<\/a> \"DataMiningSoccer<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Football Result Predictions using Data MiningData mining software used: [Data.Mining.Fox\u00ae (DMF) by Easy.Data.Mining\u2122]Please be aware of our [liability disclaimer] regarding the following predictions. Final tables: Serie A 2015\/16 Total table: Home table: Away table: Matchday 38: Serie A 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results: 2016-05-14: Juventus – Sampdoria 2 – 1 @ 65% … Continue reading Serie A 2015\/16<\/span> →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"parent":816,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":[],"yoast_head":"\n\n\n\n\n\n