{"id":2798,"date":"2015-06-24T00:02:58","date_gmt":"2015-06-23T22:02:58","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/dataminingsoccer.com\/en\/?page_id=2798"},"modified":"2015-06-24T00:51:44","modified_gmt":"2015-06-23T22:51:44","slug":"premier-league-2015-2016","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/dataminingsoccer.com\/en\/england\/predictions-premier-league\/premier-league-2015-2016\/","title":{"rendered":"Premier League 2015\/16"},"content":{"rendered":"

Football Result Predictions using Data Mining<\/h2>

Data mining software used: [Data.Mining.Fox\u00ae (DMF) by Easy.Data.Mining\u2122]<\/a>
Please be aware of our [liability disclaimer]<\/a> regarding the following predictions.<\/p>\n

\"Premier-League-Football-Result-Predictions\"<\/p>\n

Final tables: Premier League 2015\/16<\/p>\n

Total table:
\"Leicester\"<\/a> \"Arsenal\"<\/a> \"Tottenham\"<\/a> \"Man<\/a> \"Man<\/a> \"Southampton\"<\/a> \"West<\/a> \"Liverpool\"<\/a> \"Stoke\"<\/a> \"Chelsea\"<\/a> \"Everton\"<\/a> \"Swansea\"<\/a> \"Watford\"<\/a> \"West<\/a> \"Crystal<\/a> \"Bournemouth\"<\/a> \"Sunderland\"<\/a> \"Newcastle\"<\/a> \"Norwich\"<\/a> \"Aston<\/a><\/p>\n

Home table:
\"Leicester\"<\/a> \"Man<\/a> \"Arsenal\"<\/a> \"Man<\/a> \"Tottenham\"<\/a> \"Southampton\"<\/a> \"West<\/a> \"Liverpool\"<\/a> \"Swansea\"<\/a> \"Newcastle\"<\/a> \"Stoke\"<\/a> \"Sunderland\"<\/a> \"Chelsea\"<\/a> \"Watford\"<\/a> \"Everton\"<\/a> \"Norwich\"<\/a> \"West<\/a> \"Crystal<\/a> \"Bournemouth\"<\/a> \"Aston<\/a><\/p>\n

Away table:
\"Leicester\"<\/a> \"Tottenham\"<\/a> \"Arsenal\"<\/a> \"West<\/a> \"Man<\/a> \"Liverpool\"<\/a> \"Southampton\"<\/a> \"Chelsea\"<\/a> \"Man<\/a> \"Everton\"<\/a> \"Stoke\"<\/a> \"Bournemouth\"<\/a> \"Crystal<\/a> \"Watford\"<\/a> \"West<\/a> \"Swansea\"<\/a> \"Sunderland\"<\/a> \"Norwich\"<\/a> \"Newcastle\"<\/a> \"Aston<\/a><\/p>\n

\"Premier-League-Football-Result-Predictions\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Matchday 38<\/b>: Premier League 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2016-05-15:<\/td>\nArsenal<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nAston Villa<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 65%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n4<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-05-15:<\/td>\nChelsea<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nLeicester<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n@ 31%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-05-15:<\/td>\nEverton<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nNorwich<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 48%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-05-15:<\/td>\nMan Utd<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nBournemouth<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 59%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-05-15:<\/td>\nNewcastle<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nTottenham<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 38%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n5<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-05-15:<\/td>\nSouthampton<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nCrystal Palace<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 53%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n4<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-05-15:<\/td>\nStoke<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nWest Ham<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 36%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-05-15:<\/td>\nSwansea<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nMan City<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 40%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-05-15:<\/td>\nWatford<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSunderland<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 44%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-05-15:<\/td>\nWest Brom<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nLiverpool<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 45%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 38<\/b>: 6 out of 10 \/ 60%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 169 out of 380 \/ 44%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

Check here for the entire list of [statistics by team]<\/a> so far, and here for the [hit rates by various prediction categories]<\/a>.<\/p>\n

* DMSC (Data.Mining.Soccer-Confidence)<\/b> is a percentage of statistical confidence which provides insight about the statistical validity of a prediction. For more information about this artificial hybrid ratio check our section [Our analysis]<\/a>.<\/p>\n

\"Premier-League-Football-Result-Predictions\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 37<\/b>: Premier League 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2016-05-07:<\/td>\nNorwich<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nMan Utd<\/b><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 42%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-05-07:<\/td>\nAston Villa<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nNewcastle<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 43%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-05-07:<\/td>\nBournemouth<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nWest Brom<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 40%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-05-07:<\/td>\nCrystal Palace<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nStoke<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 36%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-05-07:<\/td>\nSunderland<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nChelsea<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 39%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-05-07:<\/td>\nWest Ham<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSwansea<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 43%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-05-07:<\/td>\nLeicester<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nEverton<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 45%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-05-08:<\/td>\nTottenham<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSouthampton<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 46%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-05-08:<\/td>\nLiverpool<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nWatford<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n@ 53%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-05-08:<\/td>\nMan City<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nArsenal<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 35%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 37<\/b>: 4 out of 10 \/ 40%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 163 out of 370 \/ 44%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Premier-League-Football-Result-Predictions\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 36<\/b>: Premier League 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2016-04-30:<\/td>\nEverton<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nBournemouth<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 39%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-30:<\/td>\nNewcastle<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nCrystal Palace<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 39%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-30:<\/td>\nStoke<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSunderland<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 43%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-30:<\/td>\nWatford<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nAston Villa<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 57%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-30:<\/td>\nWest Brom<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nWest Ham<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 39%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-30:<\/td>\nArsenal<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nNorwich<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 62%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-05-01:<\/td>\nSwansea<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nLiverpool<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 41%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-05-01:<\/td>\nMan Utd<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nLeicester<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 44%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-05-01:<\/td>\nSouthampton<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nMan City<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 36%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n4<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-05-02:<\/td>\nChelsea<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nTottenham<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 32%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 36<\/b>: 3 out of 10 \/ 30%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 159 out of 360 \/ 44%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Premier-League-Football-Result-Predictions\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 35<\/b>: Premier League 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2016-04-13:<\/td>\nCrystal Palace<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nEverton<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 33%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-23:<\/td>\nMan City<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nStoke<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 59%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n4<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-23:<\/td>\nAston Villa<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSouthampton<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 54%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-23:<\/td>\nBournemouth<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nChelsea<\/b><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 33%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-23:<\/td>\nLiverpool<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nNewcastle<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 59%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-24:<\/td>\nSunderland<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nArsenal<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 50%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-24:<\/td>\nLeicester<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSwansea<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 52%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n4<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-25:<\/td>\nTottenham<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nWest Brom<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 66%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-05-10:<\/td>\nWest Ham<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nMan Utd<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 35%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-05-11:<\/td>\nNorwich<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nWatford<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 42%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n4<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 35<\/b>: 5 out of 10 \/ 50%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 156 out of 350 \/ 45%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Premier-League-Football-Result-Predictions\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 34<\/b>: Premier League 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2016-04-16:<\/td>\nNorwich<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSunderland<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 43%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-16:<\/td>\nEverton<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSouthampton<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 36%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-16:<\/td>\nMan Utd<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nAston Villa<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 63%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-16:<\/td>\nNewcastle<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSwansea<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 38%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-16:<\/td>\nWest Brom<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nWatford<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 39%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-16:<\/td>\nChelsea<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nMan City<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 37%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-17:<\/td>\nBournemouth<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nLiverpool<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 42%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-17:<\/td>\nLeicester<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nWest Ham<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 45%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-17:<\/td>\nArsenal<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nCrystal Palace<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 57%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-18:<\/td>\nStoke<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nTottenham<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 48%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 34<\/b>: 2 out of 10 \/ 20%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 151 out of 340 \/ 44%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Premier-League-Football-Result-Predictions\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 33<\/b>: Premier League 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2016-04-09:<\/td>\nWest Ham<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nArsenal<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 40%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-09:<\/td>\nAston Villa<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nBournemouth<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n@ 41%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-09:<\/td>\nCrystal Palace<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nNorwich<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 36%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-09:<\/td>\nSouthampton<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nNewcastle<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 55%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-09:<\/td>\nSwansea<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nChelsea<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 38%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-09:<\/td>\nWatford<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nEverton<\/b><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 42%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-09:<\/td>\nMan City<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nWest Brom<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 52%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-10:<\/td>\nSunderland<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nLeicester<\/b><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 47%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-10:<\/td>\nLiverpool<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nStoke<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 42%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n4<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-10:<\/td>\nTottenham<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nMan Utd<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 44%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 33<\/b>: 7 out of 10 \/ 70%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 149 out of 330 \/ 45%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Premier-League-Football-Result-Predictions\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 32<\/b>: Premier League 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2016-04-02:<\/td>\nAston Villa<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nChelsea<\/b><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 53%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-02:<\/td>\nArsenal<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nWatford<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 58%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n4<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-02:<\/td>\nBournemouth<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nMan City<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 38%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-02:<\/td>\nNorwich<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nNewcastle<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 38%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-02:<\/td>\nStoke<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSwansea<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 42%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-02:<\/td>\nSunderland<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nWest Brom<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 40%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-02:<\/td>\nWest Ham<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nCrystal Palace<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 49%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-02:<\/td>\nLiverpool<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nTottenham<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n@ 33%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-03:<\/td>\nLeicester<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSouthampton<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n@ 43%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-03:<\/td>\nMan Utd<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nEverton<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 49%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 32<\/b>: 8 out of 10 \/ 80%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 142 out of 320 \/ 44%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Premier-League-Football-Result-Predictions\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 31<\/b>: Premier League 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2016-03-19:<\/td>\nEverton<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nArsenal<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 46%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-19:<\/td>\nChelsea<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nWest Ham<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 39%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-19:<\/td>\nCrystal Palace<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nLeicester<\/b><\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n@ 45%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-19:<\/td>\nWatford<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nStoke<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n@ 37%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-19:<\/td>\nWest Brom<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nNorwich<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 46%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-19:<\/td>\nSwansea<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nAston Villa<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 56%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-20:<\/td>\nNewcastle<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSunderland<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 42%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-20:<\/td>\nSouthampton<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nLiverpool<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 42%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-20:<\/td>\nMan City<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nMan Utd<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 46%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-20:<\/td>\nTottenham<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nBournemouth<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 50%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 31<\/b>: 4 out of 10 \/ 40%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 134 out of 310 \/ 43%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Premier-League-Football-Result-Predictions\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 30<\/b>: Premier League 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2016-03-12:<\/td>\nNorwich<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nMan City<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 54%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-12:<\/td>\nBournemouth<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSwansea<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 41%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-12:<\/td>\nMan Utd<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nCrystal Palace<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n@ 52%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-12:<\/td>\nStoke<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSouthampton<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 41%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-12:<\/td>\nSunderland<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nEverton<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 38%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-12:<\/td>\nWest Ham<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nWatford<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 53%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-12:<\/td>\nArsenal<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nWest Brom<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n@ 47%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-13:<\/td>\nAston Villa<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nTottenham<\/b><\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n@ 59%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-13:<\/td>\nLiverpool<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nChelsea<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n@ 36%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-14:<\/td>\nLeicester<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nNewcastle<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n@ 55%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 30<\/b>: 6 out of 10 \/ 60%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 130 out of 300 \/ 43%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Premier-League-Football-Result-Predictions\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 29<\/b>: Premier League 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2016-03-05:<\/td>\nTottenham<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nArsenal<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 49%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-05:<\/td>\nChelsea<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nStoke<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 46%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-05:<\/td>\nEverton<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nWest Ham<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 37%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-05:<\/td>\nMan City<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nAston Villa<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 55%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n4<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-05:<\/td>\nNewcastle<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nBournemouth<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 36%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-05:<\/td>\nSouthampton<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSunderland<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 55%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-05:<\/td>\nSwansea<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nNorwich<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 55%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-05:<\/td>\nWatford<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nLeicester<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 39%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-06:<\/td>\nCrystal Palace<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nLiverpool<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n@ 45%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-06:<\/td>\nWest Brom<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nMan Utd<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 40%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 29<\/b>: 4 out of 10 \/ 40%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 124 out of 290 \/ 43%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Premier-League-Football-Result-Predictions\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 28<\/b>: Premier League 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2016-03-01:<\/td>\nAston Villa<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nEverton<\/b><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 44%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-01:<\/td>\nBournemouth<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSouthampton<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 40%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-01:<\/td>\nLeicester<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nWest Brom<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 52%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-01:<\/td>\nNorwich<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nChelsea<\/b><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 47%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-01:<\/td>\nSunderland<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nCrystal Palace<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 35%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-02:<\/td>\nArsenal<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSwansea<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 59%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-02:<\/td>\nWest Ham<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nTottenham<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 42%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-02:<\/td>\nStoke<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nNewcastle<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 47%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-02:<\/td>\nLiverpool<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nMan City<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 43%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-02:<\/td>\nMan Utd<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nWatford<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 50%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 28<\/b>: 5 out of 10 \/ 50%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 120 out of 280 \/ 43%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Premier-League-Football-Result-Predictions\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 27<\/b>: Premier League 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2016-02-27:<\/td>\nWest Ham<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSunderland<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 52%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-27:<\/td>\nLeicester<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nNorwich<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n@ 51%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-27:<\/td>\nSouthampton<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nChelsea<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 28%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-27:<\/td>\nStoke<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nAston Villa<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n@ 50%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-27:<\/td>\nWatford<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nBournemouth<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 42%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-27:<\/td>\nWest Brom<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nCrystal Palace<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 39%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-28:<\/td>\nLiverpool<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nEverton<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 43%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n4<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-28:<\/td>\nNewcastle<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nMan City<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 42%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-28:<\/td>\nMan Utd<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nArsenal<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 44%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-28:<\/td>\nTottenham<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSwansea<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 65%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 27<\/b>: 5 out of 10 \/ 50%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 115 out of 270 \/ 43%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Premier-League-Football-Result-Predictions\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 26<\/b>: Premier League 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2016-02-13:<\/td>\nSunderland<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nMan Utd<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 46%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-13:<\/td>\nBournemouth<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nStoke<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 35%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-13:<\/td>\nCrystal Palace<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nWatford<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 39%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-13:<\/td>\nEverton<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nWest Brom<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 54%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-13:<\/td>\nNorwich<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nWest Ham<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 37%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-13:<\/td>\nSwansea<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSouthampton<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 37%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-13:<\/td>\nChelsea<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nNewcastle<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 52%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n5<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-14:<\/td>\nArsenal<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nLeicester<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n@ 45%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-14:<\/td>\nAston Villa<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nLiverpool<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 42%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n6<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-14:<\/td>\nMan City<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nTottenham<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 36%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 26<\/b>: 5 out of 10 \/ 50%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 110 out of 260 \/ 42%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Premier-League-Football-Result-Predictions\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 25<\/b>: Premier League 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2016-02-06:<\/td>\nMan City<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nLeicester<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 48%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-06:<\/td>\nAston Villa<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nNorwich<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 41%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-06:<\/td>\nLiverpool<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSunderland<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 54%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-06:<\/td>\nNewcastle<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nWest Brom<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 41%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-06:<\/td>\nStoke<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nEverton<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 33%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-06:<\/td>\nSwansea<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nCrystal Palace<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 43%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-06:<\/td>\nTottenham<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nWatford<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 58%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-06:<\/td>\nSouthampton<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nWest Ham<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n@ 41%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-07:<\/td>\nBournemouth<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nArsenal<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 40%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-07:<\/td>\nChelsea<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nMan Utd<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n@ 35%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 25<\/b>: 6 out of 10 \/ 60%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 105 out of 250 \/ 42%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Premier-League-Football-Result-Predictions\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 24<\/b>: Premier League 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2016-02-02:<\/td>\nArsenal<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSouthampton<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 50%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-02:<\/td>\nLeicester<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nLiverpool<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 37%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-02:<\/td>\nNorwich<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nTottenham<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 52%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-02:<\/td>\nSunderland<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nMan City<\/b><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 48%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-02:<\/td>\nWest Ham<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nAston Villa<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 53%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-02:<\/td>\nCrystal Palace<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nBournemouth<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 35%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-02:<\/td>\nMan Utd<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nStoke<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 45%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-02:<\/td>\nWest Brom<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSwansea<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n@ 36%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-03:<\/td>\nWatford<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nChelsea<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 37%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-03:<\/td>\nEverton<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nNewcastle<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 41%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 24<\/b>: 6 out of 10 \/ 60%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 99 out of 240 \/ 41%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Premier-League-Football-Result-Predictions\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 23<\/b>: Premier League 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2016-01-23:<\/td>\nNorwich<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nLiverpool<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 39%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n4<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n5<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-01-23:<\/td>\nCrystal Palace<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nTottenham<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 48%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-01-23:<\/td>\nLeicester<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nStoke<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 39%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-01-23:<\/td>\nMan Utd<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSouthampton<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 43%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-01-23:<\/td>\nSunderland<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nBournemouth<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 39%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-01-23:<\/td>\nWatford<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nNewcastle<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 37%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-01-23:<\/td>\nWest Brom<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nAston Villa<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 44%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-01-23:<\/td>\nWest Ham<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nMan City<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 43%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-01-24:<\/td>\nEverton<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSwansea<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 46%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-01-24:<\/td>\nArsenal<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nChelsea<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 49%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 23<\/b>: 2 out of 10 \/ 20%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 93 out of 230 \/ 40%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Premier-League-Football-Result-Predictions\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 22<\/b>: Premier League 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2016-01-16:<\/td>\nTottenham<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSunderland<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 59%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n4<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-01-16:<\/td>\nBournemouth<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nNorwich<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 41%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-01-16:<\/td>\nChelsea<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nEverton<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 43%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-01-16:<\/td>\nMan City<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nCrystal Palace<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 59%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n4<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-01-16:<\/td>\nNewcastle<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nWest Ham<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 40%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-01-16:<\/td>\nSouthampton<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nWest Brom<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 49%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-01-16:<\/td>\nAston Villa<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nLeicester<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 47%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-01-17:<\/td>\nLiverpool<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nMan Utd<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 45%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-01-17:<\/td>\nStoke<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nArsenal<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 42%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-01-18:<\/td>\nSwansea<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nWatford<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 39%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 22<\/b>: 3 out of 10 \/ 30%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 91 out of 220 \/ 41%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Premier-League-Football-Result-Predictions\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 21<\/b>: Premier League 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2016-01-12:<\/td>\nAston Villa<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nCrystal Palace<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 44%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-01-12:<\/td>\nBournemouth<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nWest Ham<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 34%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-01-13:<\/td>\nSwansea<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSunderland<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 48%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-01-12:<\/td>\nNewcastle<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nMan Utd<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 47%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-01-13:<\/td>\nChelsea<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nWest Brom<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 49%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-01-13:<\/td>\nMan City<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nEverton<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 61%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-01-13:<\/td>\nSouthampton<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nWatford<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 34%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-01-13:<\/td>\nStoke<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nNorwich<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 42%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-01-13:<\/td>\nLiverpool<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nArsenal<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 36%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-01-13:<\/td>\nTottenham<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nLeicester<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 40%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 21<\/b>: 2 out of 10 \/ 20%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 88 out of 210 \/ 42%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Premier-League-Football-Result-Predictions\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 20<\/b>: Premier League 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2016-01-02:<\/td>\nWest Ham<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nLiverpool<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 36%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-01-02:<\/td>\nArsenal<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nNewcastle<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 69%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-01-02:<\/td>\nLeicester<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nBournemouth<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 52%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-01-02:<\/td>\nMan Utd<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSwansea<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n@ 52%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-01-02:<\/td>\nNorwich<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSouthampton<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 31%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-01-02:<\/td>\nSunderland<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nAston Villa<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 44%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-01-02:<\/td>\nWest Brom<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nStoke<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 40%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-01-02:<\/td>\nWatford<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nMan City<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n@ 46%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-01-03:<\/td>\nCrystal Palace<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nChelsea<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 29%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-01-03:<\/td>\nEverton<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nTottenham<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 47%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 20<\/b>: 3 out of 10 \/ 30%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 86 out of 200 \/ 43%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Premier-League-Football-Result-Predictions\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 19<\/b>: Premier League 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2015-12-28:<\/td>\nCrystal Palace<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSwansea<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 50%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-28:<\/td>\nEverton<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nStoke<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 39%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-28:<\/td>\nNorwich<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nAston Villa<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 44%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-28:<\/td>\nWatford<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nTottenham<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n@ 40%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-28:<\/td>\nWest Brom<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nNewcastle<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 41%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-28:<\/td>\nArsenal<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nBournemouth<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 56%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-28:<\/td>\nMan Utd<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nChelsea<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 34%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-28:<\/td>\nWest Ham<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSouthampton<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 38%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-29:<\/td>\nLeicester<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nMan City<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 43%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-30:<\/td>\nSunderland<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nLiverpool<\/b><\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n@ 50%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 19<\/b>: 5 out of 10 \/ 50%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 83 out of 190 \/ 44%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Premier-League-Football-Result-Predictions\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 18<\/b>: Premier League 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2015-12-26:<\/td>\nStoke<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nMan Utd<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 38%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-26:<\/td>\nAston Villa<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nWest Ham<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n@ 33%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-26:<\/td>\nBournemouth<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nCrystal Palace<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 30%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-26:<\/td>\nChelsea<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nWatford<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 45%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-26:<\/td>\nLiverpool<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nLeicester<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 28%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-26:<\/td>\nMan City<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSunderland<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 68%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n4<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-26:<\/td>\nSwansea<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nWest Brom<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 43%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-26:<\/td>\nTottenham<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nNorwich<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 58%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-26:<\/td>\nNewcastle<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nEverton<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 41%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-26:<\/td>\nSouthampton<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nArsenal<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 54%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n4<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 18<\/b>: 5 out of 10 \/ 50%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 78 out of 180 \/ 43%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Premier-League-Football-Result-Predictions\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 17<\/b>: Premier League 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2015-12-19:<\/td>\nChelsea<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSunderland<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 48%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-19:<\/td>\nEverton<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nLeicester<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 39%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-19:<\/td>\nMan Utd<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nNorwich<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 55%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-19:<\/td>\nSouthampton<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nTottenham<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 42%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-19:<\/td>\nStoke<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nCrystal Palace<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 36%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-19:<\/td>\nWest Brom<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nBournemouth<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 37%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-19:<\/td>\nNewcastle<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nAston Villa<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 59%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-20:<\/td>\nWatford<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nLiverpool<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 40%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-20:<\/td>\nSwansea<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nWest Ham<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 27%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-21:<\/td>\nArsenal<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nMan City<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 48%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 17<\/b>: 2 out of 10 \/ 20%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 73 out of 170 \/ 43%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Premier-League-Football-Result-Predictions\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 16<\/b>: Premier League 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2015-12-12:<\/td>\nNorwich<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nEverton<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 41%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-12:<\/td>\nCrystal Palace<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSouthampton<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 43%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-12:<\/td>\nMan City<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSwansea<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 61%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-12:<\/td>\nSunderland<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nWatford<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 42%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-12:<\/td>\nWest Ham<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nStoke<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 36%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-12:<\/td>\nBournemouth<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nMan Utd<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 46%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-13:<\/td>\nAston Villa<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nArsenal<\/b><\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n@ 57%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-13:<\/td>\nLiverpool<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nWest Brom<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 51%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-13:<\/td>\nTottenham<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nNewcastle<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 52%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-14:<\/td>\nLeicester<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nChelsea<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 27%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 16<\/b>: 4 out of 10 \/ 40%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 71 out of 160 \/ 44%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Premier-League-Football-Result-Predictions\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 15<\/b>: Premier League 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2015-12-05:<\/td>\nStoke<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nMan City<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 51%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-05:<\/td>\nArsenal<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSunderland<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 62%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-05:<\/td>\nMan Utd<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nWest Ham<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 54%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-05:<\/td>\nSouthampton<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nAston Villa<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 62%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-05:<\/td>\nSwansea<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nLeicester<\/b><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 46%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-05:<\/td>\nWatford<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nNorwich<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 42%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-05:<\/td>\nWest Brom<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nTottenham<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 49%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-05:<\/td>\nChelsea<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nBournemouth<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 55%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-06:<\/td>\nNewcastle<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nLiverpool<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 60%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-07:<\/td>\nEverton<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nCrystal Palace<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 43%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 15<\/b>: 3 out of 10 \/ 30%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 67 out of 150 \/ 45%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Premier-League-Football-Result-Predictions\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 14<\/b>: Premier League 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2015-11-28:<\/td>\nAston Villa<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nWatford<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 36%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-28:<\/td>\nBournemouth<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nEverton<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 51%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-28:<\/td>\nCrystal Palace<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nNewcastle<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 44%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n5<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-28:<\/td>\nMan City<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSouthampton<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 51%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-28:<\/td>\nSunderland<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nStoke<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 47%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-28:<\/td>\nLeicester<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nMan Utd<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n@ 40%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-29:<\/td>\nTottenham<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nChelsea<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 48%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-29:<\/td>\nWest Ham<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nWest Brom<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 43%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-29:<\/td>\nLiverpool<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSwansea<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 52%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-29:<\/td>\nNorwich<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nArsenal<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 51%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 14<\/b>: 4 out of 10 \/ 40%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 64 out of 140 \/ 46%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Premier-League-Football-Result-Predictions\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 13<\/b>: Premier League 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2015-11-21:<\/td>\nWatford<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nMan Utd<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n@ 42%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-21:<\/td>\nChelsea<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nNorwich<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n@ 35%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-21:<\/td>\nEverton<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nAston Villa<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 63%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n4<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-21:<\/td>\nNewcastle<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nLeicester<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 46%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-21:<\/td>\nSouthampton<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nStoke<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 50%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-21:<\/td>\nSwansea<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nBournemouth<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 47%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-21:<\/td>\nWest Brom<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nArsenal<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 62%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-21:<\/td>\nMan City<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nLiverpool<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 53%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-22:<\/td>\nTottenham<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nWest Ham<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 43%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n4<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-23:<\/td>\nCrystal Palace<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSunderland<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 60%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 13<\/b>: 5 out of 10 \/ 50%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 60 out of 130 \/ 46%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Premier-League-Football-Result-Predictions\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 12<\/b>: Premier League 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2015-11-07:<\/td>\nBournemouth<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nNewcastle<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 36%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-07:<\/td>\nLeicester<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nWatford<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n@ 46%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-07:<\/td>\nMan Utd<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nWest Brom<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n@ 58%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-07:<\/td>\nNorwich<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSwansea<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 35%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-07:<\/td>\nSunderland<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSouthampton<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 50%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-07:<\/td>\nWest Ham<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nEverton<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n@ 38%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-07:<\/td>\nStoke<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nChelsea<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 33%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-08:<\/td>\nAston Villa<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nMan City<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 67%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-08:<\/td>\nArsenal<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nTottenham<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 58%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-08:<\/td>\nLiverpool<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nCrystal Palace<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 52%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 12<\/b>: 4 out of 10 \/ 40%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 55 out of 120 \/ 46%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Premier-League-Football-Result-Predictions\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 11<\/b>: Premier League 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2015-10-31:<\/td>\nChelsea<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nLiverpool<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 38%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-31:<\/td>\nCrystal Palace<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nMan Utd<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 45%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-31:<\/td>\nMan City<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nNorwich<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 64%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-31:<\/td>\nNewcastle<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nStoke<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 38%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-31:<\/td>\nSwansea<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nArsenal<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 54%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-31:<\/td>\nWatford<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nWest Ham<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 44%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-31:<\/td>\nWest Brom<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nLeicester<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 43%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-01:<\/td>\nEverton<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSunderland<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 55%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n6<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-01:<\/td>\nSouthampton<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nBournemouth<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n@ 59%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-02:<\/td>\nTottenham<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nAston Villa<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 69%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 11<\/b>: 6 out of 10 \/ 60%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 51 out of 110 \/ 46%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Premier-League-Football-Result-Predictions\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 10<\/b>: Premier League 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2015-10-24:<\/td>\nAston Villa<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSwansea<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 39%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-24:<\/td>\nLeicester<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nCrystal Palace<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 41%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-24:<\/td>\nNorwich<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nWest Brom<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 34%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-24:<\/td>\nStoke<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nWatford<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 48%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-24:<\/td>\nWest Ham<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nChelsea<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 31%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-24:<\/td>\nArsenal<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nEverton<\/b><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 63%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-25:<\/td>\nSunderland<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nNewcastle<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 37%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-25:<\/td>\nBournemouth<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nTottenham<\/b><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 45%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n5<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-25:<\/td>\nMan Utd<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nMan City<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 42%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-25:<\/td>\nLiverpool<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSouthampton<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n@ 36%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 10<\/b>: 5 out of 10 \/ 50%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 45 out of 100 \/ 45%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Premier-League-Football-Result-Predictions\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 9<\/b>: Premier League 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2015-10-17:<\/td>\nTottenham<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nLiverpool<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 47%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-17:<\/td>\nChelsea<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nAston Villa<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 49%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-17:<\/td>\nCrystal Palace<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nWest Ham<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 41%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-17:<\/td>\nEverton<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nMan Utd<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 46%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-17:<\/td>\nMan City<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nBournemouth<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 60%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n5<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-17:<\/td>\nSouthampton<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nLeicester<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 48%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-17:<\/td>\nWest Brom<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSunderland<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 50%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-17:<\/td>\nWatford<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nArsenal<\/b><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 51%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-18:<\/td>\nNewcastle<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nNorwich<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 42%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n6<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-19:<\/td>\nSwansea<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nStoke<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 41%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 9<\/b>: 5 out of 10 \/ 50%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 40 out of 90 \/ 44%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Premier-League-Football-Result-Predictions\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 8<\/b>: Premier League 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2015-10-03:<\/td>\nCrystal Palace<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nWest Brom<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 51%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-03:<\/td>\nAston Villa<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nStoke<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 48%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-03:<\/td>\nBournemouth<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nWatford<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n@ 40%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-03:<\/td>\nMan City<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nNewcastle<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 57%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n6<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-03:<\/td>\nNorwich<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nLeicester<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 38%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-03:<\/td>\nSunderland<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nWest Ham<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 47%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-03:<\/td>\nChelsea<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSouthampton<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 37%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-04:<\/td>\nEverton<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nLiverpool<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n@ 48%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-04:<\/td>\nArsenal<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nMan Utd<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 42%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-04:<\/td>\nSwansea<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nTottenham<\/b><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 24%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 8<\/b>: 5 out of 10 \/ 50%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 35 out of 80 \/ 44%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Premier-League-Football-Result-Predictions\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 7<\/b>: Premier League 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2015-09-26:<\/td>\nTottenham<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nMan City<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 47%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n4<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-26:<\/td>\nLeicester<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nArsenal<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 43%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n5<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-26:<\/td>\nLiverpool<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nAston Villa<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 57%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-26:<\/td>\nMan Utd<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSunderland<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 59%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-26:<\/td>\nSouthampton<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSwansea<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 29%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-26:<\/td>\nStoke<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nBournemouth<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 44%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-26:<\/td>\nWest Ham<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nNorwich<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 47%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-26:<\/td>\nNewcastle<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nChelsea<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 45%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-27:<\/td>\nWatford<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nCrystal Palace<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 36%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-28:<\/td>\nWest Brom<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nEverton<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 44%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 7<\/b>: 4 out of 10 \/ 40%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 30 out of 70 \/ 43%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Premier-League-Football-Result-Predictions\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 6<\/b>: Premier League 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2015-09-19:<\/td>\nChelsea<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nArsenal<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 39%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-19:<\/td>\nAston Villa<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nWest Brom<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 45%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-19:<\/td>\nBournemouth<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSunderland<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 36%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-19:<\/td>\nNewcastle<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nWatford<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 39%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-19:<\/td>\nStoke<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nLeicester<\/b><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 41%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-19:<\/td>\nSwansea<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nEverton<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 28%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-19:<\/td>\nMan City<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nWest Ham<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 54%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-20:<\/td>\nTottenham<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nCrystal Palace<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 46%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-20:<\/td>\nLiverpool<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nNorwich<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 44%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-20:<\/td>\nSouthampton<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nMan Utd<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 43%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 6<\/b>: 3 out of 10 \/ 30%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 26 out of 60 \/ 43%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Premier-League-Football-Result-Predictions\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 5<\/b>: Premier League 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2015-09-12:<\/td>\nEverton<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nChelsea<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 38%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-12:<\/td>\nArsenal<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nStoke<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 63%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-12:<\/td>\nCrystal Palace<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nMan City<\/b><\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n@ 52%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-12:<\/td>\nNorwich<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nBournemouth<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 38%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-12:<\/td>\nWatford<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSwansea<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 32%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-12:<\/td>\nWest Brom<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSouthampton<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 46%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-12:<\/td>\nMan Utd<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nLiverpool<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 49%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-13:<\/td>\nSunderland<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nTottenham<\/b><\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n@ 43%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-13:<\/td>\nLeicester<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nAston Villa<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 53%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-14:<\/td>\nWest Ham<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nNewcastle<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 46%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 5<\/b>: 5 out of 10 \/ 50%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 23 out of 50 \/ 46%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Premier-League-Football-Result-Predictions\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 4<\/b>: Premier League 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2015-08-29:<\/td>\nNewcastle<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nArsenal<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 40%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-08-29:<\/td>\nAston Villa<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSunderland<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 30%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-08-29:<\/td>\nBournemouth<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nLeicester<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n@ 34%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-08-29:<\/td>\nChelsea<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nCrystal Palace<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 41%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-08-29:<\/td>\nLiverpool<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nWest Ham<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 52%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-08-29:<\/td>\nMan City<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nWatford<\/b><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 54%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-08-29:<\/td>\nStoke<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nWest Brom<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 47%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-08-29:<\/td>\nTottenham<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nEverton<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 41%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-08-30:<\/td>\nSouthampton<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nNorwich<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 36%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-08-30:<\/td>\nSwansea<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nMan Utd<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 35%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 4<\/b>: 5 out of 10 \/ 50%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 18 out of 40 \/ 45%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Premier-League-Football-Result-Predictions\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 3<\/b>: Premier League 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2015-08-22:<\/td>\nMan Utd<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nNewcastle<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 54%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-08-22:<\/td>\nCrystal Palace<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nAston Villa<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 30%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-08-22:<\/td>\nLeicester<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nTottenham<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n@ 22%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-08-22:<\/td>\nNorwich<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nStoke<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n@ 31%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-08-22:<\/td>\nSunderland<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSwansea<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 29%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-08-22:<\/td>\nWest Ham<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nBournemouth<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 36%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-08-23:<\/td>\nWest Brom<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nChelsea<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 32%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-08-23:<\/td>\nEverton<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nMan City<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n@ 33%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-08-23:<\/td>\nWatford<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSouthampton<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 31%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-08-24:<\/td>\nArsenal<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nLiverpool<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 40%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 3<\/b>: 5 out of 10 \/ 50%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 13 out of 30 \/ 43%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Premier-League-Football-Result-Predictions\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 2<\/b>: Premier League 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2015-08-14:<\/td>\nAston Villa<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nMan Utd<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 29%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-08-15:<\/td>\nSouthampton<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nEverton<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 28%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-08-15:<\/td>\nSunderland<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nNorwich<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 25%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-08-15:<\/td>\nSwansea<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nNewcastle<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 29%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-08-15:<\/td>\nTottenham<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nStoke<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 37%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-08-15:<\/td>\nWatford<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nWest Brom<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 26%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-08-15:<\/td>\nWest Ham<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nLeicester<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 21%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-08-16:<\/td>\nCrystal Palace<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nArsenal<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n@ 23%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-08-16:<\/td>\nMan City<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nChelsea<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 27%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-08-17:<\/td>\nLiverpool<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nBournemouth<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 36%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 2<\/b>: 4 out of 10 \/ 40%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 8 out of 20 \/ 40%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Premier-League-Football-Result-Predictions\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 1<\/b>: Premier League 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2015-08-08:<\/td>\nMan Utd<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nTottenham<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 27%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-08-08:<\/td>\nBournemouth<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nAston Villa<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 21%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-08-08:<\/td>\nEverton<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nWatford<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 27%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-08-08:<\/td>\nLeicester<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSunderland<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 19%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n4<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-08-08:<\/td>\nNorwich<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nCrystal Palace<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 22%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-08-08:<\/td>\nChelsea<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSwansea<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 28%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-08-09:<\/td>\nArsenal<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nWest Ham<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 27%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-08-09:<\/td>\nNewcastle<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSouthampton<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 20%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-08-09:<\/td>\nStoke<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nLiverpool<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 21%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-08-10:<\/td>\nWest Brom<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nMan City<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 21%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 1<\/b>: 4 out of 10 \/ 40%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 4 out of 10 \/ 40%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

* DMSC (Data.Mining.Soccer-Confidence)<\/b> is a percentage of statistical confidence which provides insight about the statistical validity of a prediction. For more information about this artificial hybrid ratio check our section [Our analysis]<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Data mining software used: [Data.Mining.Fox\u00ae (DMF) by Easy.Data.Mining\u2122]<\/a><\/p>\n

\"Data-Mining-Soccer-top-of-page\"<\/a> \"Data-Mining-Soccer-football-result-prediction\"<\/a> \"DataMiningSoccer<\/a> \"DataMiningSoccer<\/a> \"DataMiningSoccer<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Football Result Predictions using Data MiningData mining software used: [Data.Mining.Fox\u00ae (DMF) by Easy.Data.Mining\u2122]Please be aware of our [liability disclaimer] regarding the following predictions. Final tables: Premier League 2015\/16 Total table: Home table: Away table: Matchday 38: Premier League 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results: 2016-05-15: Arsenal – Aston Villa 2 – 0 @ … Continue reading Premier League 2015\/16<\/span> →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"parent":798,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":[],"yoast_head":"\n\n\n\n\n\n