{"id":2806,"date":"2015-06-24T01:56:22","date_gmt":"2015-06-23T23:56:22","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/dataminingsoccer.com\/en\/?page_id=2806"},"modified":"2015-06-24T01:56:22","modified_gmt":"2015-06-23T23:56:22","slug":"champions-league-2015-2016","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"http:\/\/dataminingsoccer.com\/en\/champions-league-europe-league\/predictions\/champions-league-2015-2016\/","title":{"rendered":"Champions League 2015\/16"},"content":{"rendered":"

Football Result Predictions using Data Mining<\/h2>

Data mining software used: [Data.Mining.Fox\u00ae (DMF) by Easy.Data.Mining\u2122]<\/a>
Please be aware of our [liability disclaimer]<\/a> regarding the following predictions.<\/p>\n

\"Champions-League-Football-Result-Predictions\"<\/p>\n

Champions League 2015\/16, final<\/b>: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:
(forecasts & actual results refer to the regular playing time of 90 minutes!)<\/p>\n\n\n\n
2016-05-28:<\/td>\nReal Madrid<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nAtl.Madrid<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 53%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for the matchday<\/b>: 0 out of 1 \/ 0%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since the beginning of the tournament<\/b>: 67 out of 125 \/ 54%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Champions-League-Football-Result-Predictions\"<\/p>\n

Champions League 2015\/16, semi final, matchday 2<\/b>: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:
(forecasts & actual results refer to the regular playing time of 90 minutes!)<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n
2016-05-03:<\/td>\nBayern Munich<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nAtl.Madrid<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 57%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-05-04:<\/td>\nReal Madrid<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nMan City<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 56%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for the matchday<\/b>: 2 out of 2 \/ 100%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since the beginning of the tournament<\/b>: 67 out of 124 \/ 54%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Champions-League-Football-Result-Predictions\"<\/p>\n

Champions League 2015\/16, semi final, matchday 1<\/b>: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n
2016-04-26:<\/td>\nMan City<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nReal Madrid<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 20%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-27:<\/td>\nAtl.Madrid<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nBayern Munich<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 44%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for the matchday<\/b>: 1 out of 2 \/ 50%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since the beginning of the tournament<\/b>: 65 out of 122 \/ 53%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Champions-League-Football-Result-Predictions\"<\/p>\n

Champions League 2015\/16, quarter final, matchday 2<\/b>: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:
(forecasts & actual results refer to the regular playing time of 90 minutes!)<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2016-04-12:<\/td>\nMan City<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nParis St.G.<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 21%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-12:<\/td>\nReal Madrid<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nVfL Wolfsburg<\/b><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 63%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-13:<\/td>\nAtl.Madrid<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nBarcelona<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 29%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-13:<\/td>\nLisboa e Benfica<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nBayern Munich<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 49%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for the matchday<\/b>: 1 out of 4 \/ 25%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since the beginning of the tournament<\/b>: 64 out of 120 \/ 53%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Champions-League-Football-Result-Predictions\"<\/p>\n

Champions League 2015\/16, quarter final, matchday 1<\/b>: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2016-04-05:<\/td>\nBayern Munich<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nLisboa e Benfica<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 61%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-05:<\/td>\nBarcelona<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nAtl.Madrid<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n@ 59%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-06:<\/td>\nVfL Wolfsburg<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nReal Madrid<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 49%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-06:<\/td>\nParis St.G.<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nMan City<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 45%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for the matchday<\/b>: 2 out of 4 \/ 50%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since the beginning of the tournament<\/b>: 63 out of 116 \/ 54%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Champions-League-Football-Result-Predictions\"<\/p>\n

Champions League 2015\/16, round of 16, matchday 2<\/b>: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:
(forecasts & actual results refer to the regular playing time of 90 minutes!)<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2016-03-08:<\/td>\nVfL Wolfsburg<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nKAA Gent<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 59%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-08:<\/td>\nReal Madrid<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nRoma<\/b><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 66%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-09:<\/td>\nChelsea<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nParis St.G.<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 45%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-09:<\/td>\nZenit<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nLisboa e Benfica<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 52%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-15:<\/td>\nMan City<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nDynamo Kiev<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 59%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-15:<\/td>\nAtl.Madrid<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nPSV Eindhoven<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 63%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-16:<\/td>\nBayern Munich<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nJuventus<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 57%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-16:<\/td>\nBarcelona<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nArsenal<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 63%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for the matchday<\/b>: 3 out of 8 \/ 38%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since the beginning of the tournament<\/b>: 61 out of 112 \/ 54%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Champions-League-Football-Result-Predictions\"<\/p>\n

Champions League 2015\/16, round of 16, matchday 1<\/b>: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2016-02-16:<\/td>\nParis St.G.<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nChelsea<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n@ 38%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-16:<\/td>\nLisboa e Benfica<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nZenit<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 24%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-17:<\/td>\nKAA Gent<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nVfL Wolfsburg<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 35%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-17:<\/td>\nRoma<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nReal Madrid<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 48%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-23:<\/td>\nArsenal<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nBarcelona<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 46%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-23:<\/td>\nJuventus<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nBayern Munich<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 21%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-24:<\/td>\nPSV Eindhoven<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nAtl.Madrid<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 48%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-24:<\/td>\nDynamo Kiev<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nMan City<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 42%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for the matchday<\/b>: 5 out of 8 \/ 63%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since the beginning of the tournament<\/b>: 58 out of 104 \/ 56%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Champions-League-Football-Result-Predictions\"<\/p>\n

The group tables before this matchday:<\/p>\n\n<\/td>\n
Group A:<\/b><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
1.<\/td>\nReal Madrid<\/td>\n16<\/td>\npts.<\/td>\n19 – 3<\/td>\ng.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2.<\/td>\nParis St.G.<\/td>\n13<\/td>\npts.<\/td>\n12 – 1<\/td>\ng.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
3.<\/td>\nShakhtar Donetsk<\/td>\n3<\/td>\npts.<\/td>\n7 – 14<\/td>\ng.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
4.<\/td>\nMalm\u00f6 FF<\/td>\n3<\/td>\npts.<\/td>\n1 – 21<\/td>\ng.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\nGroup B:<\/b><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
1.<\/td>\nVfL Wolfsburg<\/td>\n12<\/td>\npts.<\/td>\n9 – 6<\/td>\ng.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2.<\/td>\nPSV Eindhoven<\/td>\n10<\/td>\npts.<\/td>\n8 – 7<\/td>\ng.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
3.<\/td>\nMan Utd<\/td>\n8<\/td>\npts.<\/td>\n7 – 7<\/td>\ng.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
4.<\/td>\nCSKA Moscow<\/td>\n4<\/td>\npts.<\/td>\n5 – 9<\/td>\ng.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/td>\nGroup C:<\/b><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
1.<\/td>\nAtl.Madrid<\/td>\n13<\/td>\npts.<\/td>\n11 – 3<\/td>\ng.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2.<\/td>\nLisboa e Benfica<\/td>\n10<\/td>\npts.<\/td>\n10 – 8<\/td>\ng.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
3.<\/td>\nGalatasaray<\/td>\n5<\/td>\npts.<\/td>\n6 – 10<\/td>\ng.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
4.<\/td>\nFC Astana<\/td>\n4<\/td>\npts.<\/td>\n5 – 11<\/td>\ng.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\nGroup D:<\/b><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
1.<\/td>\nMan City<\/td>\n12<\/td>\npts.<\/td>\n12 – 8<\/td>\ng.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2.<\/td>\nJuventus<\/td>\n11<\/td>\npts.<\/td>\n6 – 3<\/td>\ng.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
3.<\/td>\nSevilla<\/td>\n6<\/td>\npts.<\/td>\n8 – 11<\/td>\ng.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
4.<\/td>\nBorussia M\u2019Gladbach<\/td>\n5<\/td>\npts.<\/td>\n8 – 12<\/td>\ng.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/td>\nGroup E:<\/b><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
1.<\/td>\nBarcelona<\/td>\n14<\/td>\npts.<\/td>\n15 – 4<\/td>\ng.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2.<\/td>\nRoma<\/td>\n6<\/td>\npts.<\/td>\n11 – 16<\/td>\ng.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
3.<\/td>\nBayer Leverkusen<\/td>\n6<\/td>\npts.<\/td>\n13 – 12<\/td>\ng.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
4.<\/td>\nBATE Baryssau<\/td>\n5<\/td>\npts.<\/td>\n5 – 12<\/td>\ng.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\nGroup F:<\/b><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
1.<\/td>\nBayern Munich<\/td>\n15<\/td>\npts.<\/td>\n19 – 3<\/td>\ng.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2.<\/td>\nArsenal<\/td>\n9<\/td>\npts.<\/td>\n12 – 10<\/td>\ng.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
3.<\/td>\nOlympiakos Piraeus<\/td>\n9<\/td>\npts.<\/td>\n6 – 13<\/td>\ng.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
4.<\/td>\nDinamo Zagreb<\/td>\n3<\/td>\npts.<\/td>\n3 – 14<\/td>\ng.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/td>\nGroup G:<\/b><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
1.<\/td>\nChelsea<\/td>\n13<\/td>\npts.<\/td>\n13 – 3<\/td>\ng.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2.<\/td>\nDynamo Kiev<\/td>\n11<\/td>\npts.<\/td>\n8 – 4<\/td>\ng.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
3.<\/td>\nOporto<\/td>\n10<\/td>\npts.<\/td>\n9 – 8<\/td>\ng.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
4.<\/td>\nMaccabi Tel Aviv<\/td>\n0<\/td>\npts.<\/td>\n1 – 16<\/td>\ng.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\nGroup H:<\/b><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
1.<\/td>\nZenit<\/td>\n15<\/td>\npts.<\/td>\n13 – 6<\/td>\ng.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2.<\/td>\nKAA Gent<\/td>\n10<\/td>\npts.<\/td>\n8 – 7<\/td>\ng.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
3.<\/td>\nValencia<\/td>\n6<\/td>\npts.<\/td>\n5 – 9<\/td>\ng.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
4.<\/td>\nLyon<\/td>\n4<\/td>\npts.<\/td>\n5 – 9<\/td>\ng.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

\"Champions-League-Football-Result-Predictions\"<\/p>\n

Champions League 2015\/16, group stage, matchday 6<\/b>: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2015-12-08:<\/td>\nReal Madrid<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nMalm\u00f6 FF<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 65%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n8<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-08:<\/td>\nParis St.G.<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nShakhtar Donetsk<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 55%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-08:<\/td>\nVfL Wolfsburg<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nMan Utd<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 17%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-08:<\/td>\nPSV Eindhoven<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nCSKA Moscow<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 21%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-08:<\/td>\nLisboa e Benfica<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nAtl.Madrid<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n@ 39%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-08:<\/td>\nGalatasaray<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nFC Astana<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 64%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-08:<\/td>\nMan City<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nBorussia M\u2019Gladbach<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 24%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n4<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-08:<\/td>\nSevilla<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nJuventus<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 15%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-09:<\/td>\nBayer Leverkusen<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nBarcelona<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 51%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-09:<\/td>\nRoma<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nBATE Baryssau<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 56%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-09:<\/td>\nOlympiakos Piraeus<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nArsenal<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 37%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-09:<\/td>\nDinamo Zagreb<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nBayern Munich<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n@ 51%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-09:<\/td>\nChelsea<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nOporto<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 55%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-09:<\/td>\nDynamo Kiev<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nMaccabi Tel Aviv<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 59%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-09:<\/td>\nKAA Gent<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nZenit<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 25%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-09:<\/td>\nValencia<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nLyon<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 56%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for the matchday<\/b>: 7 out of 16 \/ 44%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since the beginning of the tournament<\/b>: 53 out of 96 \/ 55%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Champions-League-Football-Result-Predictions\"<\/p>\n

Champions League 2015\/16, group stage, matchday 5<\/b>: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2015-11-25:<\/td>\nMalm\u00f6 FF<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nParis St.G.<\/b><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 57%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n5<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-25:<\/td>\nShakhtar Donetsk<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nReal Madrid<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 56%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-25:<\/td>\nMan Utd<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nPSV Eindhoven<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 59%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-25:<\/td>\nCSKA Moscow<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nVfL Wolfsburg<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 23%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-25:<\/td>\nAtl.Madrid<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nGalatasaray<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n@ 66%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-25:<\/td>\nFC Astana<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nLisboa e Benfica<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 52%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-25:<\/td>\nBorussia M\u2019Gladbach<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSevilla<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 23%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n4<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-25:<\/td>\nJuventus<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nMan City<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 19%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-24:<\/td>\nBATE Baryssau<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nBayer Leverkusen<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n@ 52%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-24:<\/td>\nBarcelona<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nRoma<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 64%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n6<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-24:<\/td>\nBayern Munich<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nOlympiakos Piraeus<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 63%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n4<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-24:<\/td>\nArsenal<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nDinamo Zagreb<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 54%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-24:<\/td>\nMaccabi Tel Aviv<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nChelsea<\/b><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 58%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-24:<\/td>\nOporto<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nDynamo Kiev<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 49%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-24:<\/td>\nLyon<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nKAA Gent<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 54%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-24:<\/td>\nZenit<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nValencia<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 23%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for the matchday<\/b>: 7 out of 16 \/ 44%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since the beginning of the tournament<\/b>: 46 out of 80 \/ 58%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Champions-League-Football-Result-Predictions\"<\/p>\n

Champions League 2015\/16, group stage, matchday 4<\/b>: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2015-11-03:<\/td>\nReal Madrid<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nParis St.G.<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 50%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-03:<\/td>\nShakhtar Donetsk<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nMalm\u00f6 FF<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 56%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n4<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-03:<\/td>\nMan Utd<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nCSKA Moscow<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 61%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-03:<\/td>\nPSV Eindhoven<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nVfL Wolfsburg<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 43%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-03:<\/td>\nFC Astana<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nAtl.Madrid<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 57%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-03:<\/td>\nLisboa e Benfica<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nGalatasaray<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n@ 53%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-03:<\/td>\nBorussia M\u2019Gladbach<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nJuventus<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n@ 18%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-03:<\/td>\nSevilla<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nMan City<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 22%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-04:<\/td>\nBarcelona<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nBATE Baryssau<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 69%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-04:<\/td>\nRoma<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nBayer Leverkusen<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 43%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-04:<\/td>\nBayern Munich<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nArsenal<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 60%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n5<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-04:<\/td>\nOlympiakos Piraeus<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nDinamo Zagreb<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 53%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-04:<\/td>\nChelsea<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nDynamo Kiev<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 58%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-04:<\/td>\nMaccabi Tel Aviv<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nOporto<\/b><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 56%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-04:<\/td>\nKAA Gent<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nValencia<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 40%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-04:<\/td>\nLyon<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nZenit<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 23%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for the matchday<\/b>: 11 out of 16 \/ 69%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since the beginning of the tournament<\/b>: 39 out of 64 \/ 61%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Champions-League-Football-Result-Predictions\"<\/p>\n

Champions League 2015\/16, group stage, matchday 3<\/b>: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2015-10-21:<\/td>\nParis St.G.<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nReal Madrid<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 22%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-21:<\/td>\nMalm\u00f6 FF<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nShakhtar Donetsk<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 44%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-21:<\/td>\nVfL Wolfsburg<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nPSV Eindhoven<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 46%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-21:<\/td>\nCSKA Moscow<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nMan Utd<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 40%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-21:<\/td>\nAtl.Madrid<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nFC Astana<\/b><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 62%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n4<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-21:<\/td>\nGalatasaray<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nLisboa e Benfica<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 32%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-21:<\/td>\nMan City<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSevilla<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n@ 50%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-21:<\/td>\nJuventus<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nBorussia M\u2019Gladbach<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 57%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-20:<\/td>\nBATE Baryssau<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nBarcelona<\/b><\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n@ 49%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-20:<\/td>\nBayer Leverkusen<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nRoma<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 22%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n4<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-20:<\/td>\nArsenal<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nBayern Munich<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 40%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-20:<\/td>\nDinamo Zagreb<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nOlympiakos Piraeus<\/b><\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n@ 27%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-20:<\/td>\nOporto<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nMaccabi Tel Aviv<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n@ 57%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-20:<\/td>\nDynamo Kiev<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nChelsea<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 47%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-20:<\/td>\nValencia<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nKAA Gent<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 51%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-20:<\/td>\nZenit<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nLyon<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 22%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for the matchday<\/b>: 9 out of 16 \/ 56%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since the beginning of the tournament<\/b>: 28 out of 48 \/ 58%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Champions-League-Football-Result-Predictions\"<\/p>\n

Champions League 2015\/16, group stage, matchday 2<\/b>: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2015-09-30:<\/td>\nMalm\u00f6 FF<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nReal Madrid<\/b><\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n@ 45%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-30:<\/td>\nShakhtar Donetsk<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nParis St.G.<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 13%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-30:<\/td>\nMan Utd<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nVfL Wolfsburg<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n@ 41%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-30:<\/td>\nCSKA Moscow<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nPSV Eindhoven<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 41%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-30:<\/td>\nAtl.Madrid<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nLisboa e Benfica<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 44%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-30:<\/td>\nFC Astana<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nGalatasaray<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 43%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-30:<\/td>\nBorussia M\u2019Gladbach<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nMan City<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n@ 26%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-30:<\/td>\nJuventus<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSevilla<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 47%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-29:<\/td>\nBATE Baryssau<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nRoma<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 32%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-29:<\/td>\nBarcelona<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nBayer Leverkusen<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n@ 53%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-29:<\/td>\nBayern Munich<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nDinamo Zagreb<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 52%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n5<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-29:<\/td>\nArsenal<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nOlympiakos Piraeus<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 41%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-29:<\/td>\nMaccabi Tel Aviv<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nDynamo Kiev<\/b><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 43%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-29:<\/td>\nOporto<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nChelsea<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 14%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-29:<\/td>\nLyon<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nValencia<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 21%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-29:<\/td>\nZenit<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nKAA Gent<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 47%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for the matchday<\/b>: 9 out of 16 \/ 56%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since the beginning of the tournament<\/b>: 19 out of 32 \/ 59%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Champions-League-Football-Result-Predictions\"<\/p>\n

Champions League 2015\/16, group stage, matchday 1<\/b>: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2015-09-15:<\/td>\nReal Madrid<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nShakhtar Donetsk<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 46%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n4<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-15:<\/td>\nParis St.G.<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nMalm\u00f6 FF<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n@ 43%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-15:<\/td>\nVfL Wolfsburg<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nCSKA Moscow<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 30%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-15:<\/td>\nPSV Eindhoven<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nMan Utd<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 25%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-15:<\/td>\nLisboa e Benfica<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nFC Astana<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n@ 43%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-15:<\/td>\nGalatasaray<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nAtl.Madrid<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 29%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-15:<\/td>\nMan City<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nJuventus<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 37%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-15:<\/td>\nSevilla<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nBorussia M\u2019Gladbach<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 37%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-16:<\/td>\nBayer Leverkusen<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nBATE Baryssau<\/b><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 40%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n4<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-16:<\/td>\nRoma<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nBarcelona<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 31%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-16:<\/td>\nOlympiakos Piraeus<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nBayern Munich<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 37%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-16:<\/td>\nDinamo Zagreb<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nArsenal<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 23%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-16:<\/td>\nChelsea<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nMaccabi Tel Aviv<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 48%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n4<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-16:<\/td>\nDynamo Kiev<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nOporto<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 14%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-16:<\/td>\nKAA Gent<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nLyon<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 26%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-16:<\/td>\nValencia<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nZenit<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 35%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for the matchday<\/b>: 10 out of 16 \/ 63%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since the beginning of the tournament<\/b>: 10 out of 16 \/ 63%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

* DMSC (Data.Mining.Soccer-Confidence)<\/b> is a percentage of statistical confidence which provides insight about the statistical validity of a prediction. For more information about this artificial hybrid ratio check our section [Our analysis]<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Data mining software used: [Data.Mining.Fox\u00ae (DMF) by Easy.Data.Mining\u2122]<\/a><\/p>\n

\"Data-Mining-Soccer-top-of-page\"<\/a> \"Data-Mining-Soccer-football-result-prediction\"<\/a> \"DataMiningSoccer<\/a> \"DataMiningSoccer<\/a> \"DataMiningSoccer<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Football Result Predictions using Data MiningData mining software used: [Data.Mining.Fox\u00ae (DMF) by Easy.Data.Mining\u2122]Please be aware of our [liability disclaimer] regarding the following predictions. Champions League 2015\/16, final: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:(forecasts & actual results refer to the regular playing time of 90 minutes!) 2016-05-28: Real Madrid – Atl.Madrid 2 – 1 @ … Continue reading Champions League 2015\/16<\/span> →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"parent":2636,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":[],"yoast_head":"\n\n\n\n\n\n