{"id":2794,"date":"2015-06-23T22:09:02","date_gmt":"2015-06-23T20:09:02","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/dataminingsoccer.com\/en\/?page_id=2794"},"modified":"2015-06-24T00:48:47","modified_gmt":"2015-06-23T22:48:47","slug":"2-bundesliga-2015-2016","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"http:\/\/dataminingsoccer.com\/en\/germany\/predictions-1-bundesliga\/2-bundesliga-2015-2016\/","title":{"rendered":"2.Bundesliga 2015\/16"},"content":{"rendered":"

Football Result Predictions using Data Mining<\/h2>

Data mining software used: [Data.Mining.Fox\u00ae (DMF) by Easy.Data.Mining\u2122]<\/a>
Please be aware of our [liability disclaimer]<\/a> regarding the following predictions.<\/p>\n

\"Bundesliga-Football-Result-Predictions\"<\/p>\n

Final tables: 2.Bundesliga 2015\/16<\/p>\n

Total table:
\"SC<\/a> \"RB<\/a> \"1.FC<\/a> \"FC<\/a> \"VfL<\/a> \"1.FC<\/a> \"Karlsruher<\/a> \"Eintracht<\/a> \"SpVgg<\/a> \"1.FC<\/a> \"1.FC<\/a> \"SV<\/a> \"Arminia<\/a> \"Fortuna<\/a> \"TSV<\/a> \"MSV<\/a> \"FSV<\/a> \"SC<\/a><\/p>\n

Home table:
\"SC<\/a> \"1.FC<\/a> \"RB<\/a> \"1.FC<\/a> \"FC<\/a> \"VfL<\/a> \"Karlsruher<\/a> \"Eintracht<\/a> \"SpVgg<\/a> \"1.FC<\/a> \"TSV<\/a> \"SV<\/a> \"MSV<\/a> \"1.FC<\/a> \"Fortuna<\/a> \"Arminia<\/a> \"SC<\/a> \"FSV<\/a><\/p>\n

Away table:
\"SC<\/a> \"RB<\/a> \"1.FC<\/a> \"1.FC<\/a> \"FC<\/a> \"VfL<\/a> \"Arminia<\/a> \"1.FC<\/a> \"SV<\/a> \"SpVgg<\/a> \"Eintracht<\/a> \"FSV<\/a> \"Karlsruher<\/a> \"1.FC<\/a> \"SC<\/a> \"Fortuna<\/a> \"TSV<\/a> \"MSV<\/a><\/p>\n

\"Bundesliga-Football-Result-Predictions\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Matchday 34<\/b>: 2.Bundesliga 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2016-05-15:<\/td>\nSC Paderborn 07<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1.FC N\u00fcrnberg<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 32%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-05-15:<\/td>\nKarlsruher SC<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nArminia Bielefeld<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 42%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-05-15:<\/td>\nEintracht Braunschweig<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nFortuna D\u00fcsseldorf<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 44%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-05-15:<\/td>\n1.FC Union Berlin<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSC Freiburg<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 42%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-05-15:<\/td>\nSpVgg Greuther F\u00fcrth<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSV Sandhausen<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 41%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-05-15:<\/td>\nFC St.Pauli<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1.FC Kaiserslautern<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 37%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n5<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-05-15:<\/td>\n1.FC Heidenheim 1846<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nVfL Bochum<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 42%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-05-15:<\/td>\nFSV Frankfurt<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nTSV 1860 M\u00fcnchen<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 38%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-05-15:<\/td>\nMSV Duisburg<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nRB Leipzig<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 43%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 34<\/b>: 1 out of 9 \/ 11%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 122 out of 306 \/ 40%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

Check here for the entire list of [statistics by team]<\/a> so far, and here for the [hit rates by various prediction categories]<\/a>.<\/p>\n

* DMSC (Data.Mining.Soccer-Confidence)<\/b> is a percentage of statistical confidence which provides insight about the statistical validity of a prediction. For more information about this artificial hybrid ratio check our section [Our analysis]<\/a>.<\/p>\n

\"Bundesliga-Football-Result-Predictions\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 33<\/b>: 2.Bundesliga 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2016-05-08:<\/td>\nTSV 1860 M\u00fcnchen<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSC Paderborn 07<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 44%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-05-08:<\/td>\nArminia Bielefeld<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1.FC Union Berlin<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 41%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-05-08:<\/td>\nFortuna D\u00fcsseldorf<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nFSV Frankfurt<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 40%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-05-08:<\/td>\n1.FC Kaiserslautern<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSpVgg Greuther F\u00fcrth<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 44%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-05-08:<\/td>\n1.FC N\u00fcrnberg<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nFC St.Pauli<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 46%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-05-08:<\/td>\nRB Leipzig<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nKarlsruher SC<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 51%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-05-08:<\/td>\nSC Freiburg<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1.FC Heidenheim 1846<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 55%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-05-08:<\/td>\nSV Sandhausen<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nMSV Duisburg<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 35%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-05-08:<\/td>\nVfL Bochum<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nEintracht Braunschweig<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 41%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 33<\/b>: 6 out of 9 \/ 67%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 121 out of 297 \/ 41%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Bundesliga-Football-Result-Predictions\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 32<\/b>: 2.Bundesliga 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2016-04-29:<\/td>\nSC Paderborn 07<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSC Freiburg<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n@ 52%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-29:<\/td>\nRB Leipzig<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nArminia Bielefeld<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 56%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-29:<\/td>\n1.FC Union Berlin<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nVfL Bochum<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 35%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-29:<\/td>\nFC St.Pauli<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nTSV 1860 M\u00fcnchen<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 43%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-29:<\/td>\nFSV Frankfurt<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1.FC Kaiserslautern<\/b><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 41%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-29:<\/td>\nMSV Duisburg<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nFortuna D\u00fcsseldorf<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 39%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-30:<\/td>\nEintracht Braunschweig<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1.FC N\u00fcrnberg<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 37%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-30:<\/td>\nSpVgg Greuther F\u00fcrth<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1.FC Heidenheim 1846<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 40%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-05-02:<\/td>\nKarlsruher SC<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSV Sandhausen<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 45%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 32<\/b>: 3 out of 9 \/ 33%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 115 out of 288 \/ 40%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Bundesliga-Football-Result-Predictions\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 31<\/b>: 2.Bundesliga 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2016-04-22:<\/td>\nSC Freiburg<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nMSV Duisburg<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 58%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-22:<\/td>\nFortuna D\u00fcsseldorf<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nFC St.Pauli<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n@ 35%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-22:<\/td>\nVfL Bochum<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nKarlsruher SC<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 38%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-23:<\/td>\n1.FC N\u00fcrnberg<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1.FC Union Berlin<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 40%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n6<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-23:<\/td>\n1.FC Heidenheim 1846<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSC Paderborn 07<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n@ 37%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-24:<\/td>\nTSV 1860 M\u00fcnchen<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nEintracht Braunschweig<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n@ 38%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-24:<\/td>\nSV Sandhausen<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nFSV Frankfurt<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 41%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-24:<\/td>\nArminia Bielefeld<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSpVgg Greuther F\u00fcrth<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 38%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n4<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-25:<\/td>\n1.FC Kaiserslautern<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nRB Leipzig<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 38%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 31<\/b>: 6 out of 9 \/ 67%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 112 out of 279 \/ 40%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Bundesliga-Football-Result-Predictions\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 30<\/b>: 2.Bundesliga 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2016-04-15:<\/td>\nRB Leipzig<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSV Sandhausen<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 65%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-15:<\/td>\nFSV Frankfurt<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSC Paderborn 07<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 43%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-15:<\/td>\nMSV Duisburg<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nTSV 1860 M\u00fcnchen<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 42%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-16:<\/td>\nKarlsruher SC<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1.FC N\u00fcrnberg<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 32%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-16:<\/td>\nFC St.Pauli<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nVfL Bochum<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 39%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-17:<\/td>\n1.FC Union Berlin<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1.FC Heidenheim 1846<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 45%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-17:<\/td>\nSpVgg Greuther F\u00fcrth<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nFortuna D\u00fcsseldorf<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 45%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-17:<\/td>\nArminia Bielefeld<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1.FC Kaiserslautern<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 43%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-18:<\/td>\nEintracht Braunschweig<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSC Freiburg<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 40%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 30<\/b>: 2 out of 9 \/ 22%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 106 out of 270 \/ 39%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Bundesliga-Football-Result-Predictions\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 29<\/b>: 2.Bundesliga 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2016-04-08:<\/td>\nSC Paderborn 07<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1.FC Union Berlin<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 39%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-08:<\/td>\nTSV 1860 M\u00fcnchen<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSpVgg Greuther F\u00fcrth<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 45%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-08:<\/td>\n1.FC Heidenheim 1846<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nEintracht Braunschweig<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 40%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-09:<\/td>\nVfL Bochum<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nFSV Frankfurt<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 48%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n4<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-09:<\/td>\nSV Sandhausen<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nArminia Bielefeld<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 50%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-10:<\/td>\nSC Freiburg<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nFC St.Pauli<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 52%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n4<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-10:<\/td>\n1.FC Kaiserslautern<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nKarlsruher SC<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 38%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-10:<\/td>\n1.FC N\u00fcrnberg<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nMSV Duisburg<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 63%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-11:<\/td>\nFortuna D\u00fcsseldorf<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nRB Leipzig<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 47%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 29<\/b>: 4 out of 9 \/ 44%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 104 out of 261 \/ 40%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Bundesliga-Football-Result-Predictions\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 28<\/b>: 2.Bundesliga 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2016-04-01:<\/td>\nEintracht Braunschweig<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSC Paderborn 07<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 31%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-01:<\/td>\nFC St.Pauli<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1.FC Union Berlin<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 37%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-01:<\/td>\nMSV Duisburg<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1.FC Heidenheim 1846<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 47%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-02:<\/td>\nRB Leipzig<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nVfL Bochum<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 48%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-02:<\/td>\nArminia Bielefeld<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nFortuna D\u00fcsseldorf<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 43%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-03:<\/td>\nKarlsruher SC<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nTSV 1860 M\u00fcnchen<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 42%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-03:<\/td>\n1.FC Kaiserslautern<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSV Sandhausen<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 41%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-03:<\/td>\nFSV Frankfurt<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1.FC N\u00fcrnberg<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 51%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-04-04:<\/td>\nSpVgg Greuther F\u00fcrth<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSC Freiburg<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 44%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 28<\/b>: 6 out of 9 \/ 67%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 100 out of 252 \/ 40%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Bundesliga-Football-Result-Predictions\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 27<\/b>: 2.Bundesliga 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2016-03-18:<\/td>\nSC Paderborn 07<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nMSV Duisburg<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 43%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-18:<\/td>\n1.FC Union Berlin<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nEintracht Braunschweig<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 32%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-18:<\/td>\n1.FC Heidenheim 1846<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nFSV Frankfurt<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 45%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-19:<\/td>\nFortuna D\u00fcsseldorf<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1.FC Kaiserslautern<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 43%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n4<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-19:<\/td>\nSV Sandhausen<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nFC St.Pauli<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 38%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-20:<\/td>\n1.FC N\u00fcrnberg<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nRB Leipzig<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 42%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-20:<\/td>\nVfL Bochum<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSpVgg Greuther F\u00fcrth<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 45%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-20:<\/td>\nTSV 1860 M\u00fcnchen<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nArminia Bielefeld<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 43%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-21:<\/td>\nSC Freiburg<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nKarlsruher SC<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 53%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 27<\/b>: 1 out of 9 \/ 11%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 94 out of 243 \/ 39%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Bundesliga-Football-Result-Predictions\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 26<\/b>: 2.Bundesliga 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2016-03-11:<\/td>\nSpVgg Greuther F\u00fcrth<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nEintracht Braunschweig<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 36%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-11:<\/td>\nFC St.Pauli<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSC Paderborn 07<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 43%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-11:<\/td>\nArminia Bielefeld<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1.FC N\u00fcrnberg<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 47%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-12:<\/td>\nSV Sandhausen<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nFortuna D\u00fcsseldorf<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 43%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-12:<\/td>\nMSV Duisburg<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1.FC Union Berlin<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 43%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-13:<\/td>\nKarlsruher SC<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1.FC Heidenheim 1846<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 38%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-13:<\/td>\nRB Leipzig<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nTSV 1860 M\u00fcnchen<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n@ 59%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-13:<\/td>\nFSV Frankfurt<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSC Freiburg<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 51%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-14:<\/td>\n1.FC Kaiserslautern<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nVfL Bochum<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 37%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 26<\/b>: 4 out of 9 \/ 44%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 93 out of 234 \/ 40%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Bundesliga-Football-Result-Predictions\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 25<\/b>: 2.Bundesliga 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2016-03-04:<\/td>\nFortuna D\u00fcsseldorf<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nKarlsruher SC<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 36%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-04:<\/td>\nTSV 1860 M\u00fcnchen<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSV Sandhausen<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 48%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-04:<\/td>\n1.FC N\u00fcrnberg<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1.FC Kaiserslautern<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n@ 50%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-05:<\/td>\nSC Paderborn 07<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSpVgg Greuther F\u00fcrth<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n@ 35%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-05:<\/td>\n1.FC Union Berlin<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nFSV Frankfurt<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 44%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n4<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-06:<\/td>\nEintracht Braunschweig<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nMSV Duisburg<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 49%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-06:<\/td>\nVfL Bochum<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nArminia Bielefeld<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 56%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-06:<\/td>\n1.FC Heidenheim 1846<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nFC St.Pauli<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 37%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-07:<\/td>\nSC Freiburg<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nRB Leipzig<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 47%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 25<\/b>: 4 out of 9 \/ 44%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 89 out of 225 \/ 40%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Bundesliga-Football-Result-Predictions\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 24<\/b>: 2.Bundesliga 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2016-03-01:<\/td>\nKarlsruher SC<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSC Paderborn 07<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 40%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-01:<\/td>\n1.FC Kaiserslautern<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nTSV 1860 M\u00fcnchen<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 49%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-01:<\/td>\nFortuna D\u00fcsseldorf<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nVfL Bochum<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 34%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-01:<\/td>\nSpVgg Greuther F\u00fcrth<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1.FC Union Berlin<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 38%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-01:<\/td>\nSV Sandhausen<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1.FC N\u00fcrnberg<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 38%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-02:<\/td>\nRB Leipzig<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1.FC Heidenheim 1846<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 56%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-02:<\/td>\nFSV Frankfurt<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nMSV Duisburg<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 46%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-02:<\/td>\nArminia Bielefeld<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSC Freiburg<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 43%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-03-03:<\/td>\nFC St.Pauli<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nEintracht Braunschweig<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 38%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 24<\/b>: 2 out of 9 \/ 22%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 85 out of 216 \/ 39%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Bundesliga-Football-Result-Predictions\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 23<\/b>: 2.Bundesliga 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2016-02-26:<\/td>\nSC Paderborn 07<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nRB Leipzig<\/b><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 52%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-26:<\/td>\n1.FC N\u00fcrnberg<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSpVgg Greuther F\u00fcrth<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n@ 46%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-26:<\/td>\n1.FC Union Berlin<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nKarlsruher SC<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 38%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-27:<\/td>\nSC Freiburg<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1.FC Kaiserslautern<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 40%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-27:<\/td>\nVfL Bochum<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSV Sandhausen<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 49%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-27:<\/td>\nTSV 1860 M\u00fcnchen<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nFortuna D\u00fcsseldorf<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 44%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-28:<\/td>\nEintracht Braunschweig<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nFSV Frankfurt<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 43%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-28:<\/td>\n1.FC Heidenheim 1846<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nArminia Bielefeld<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 46%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-28:<\/td>\nMSV Duisburg<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nFC St.Pauli<\/b><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 43%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 23<\/b>: 5 out of 9 \/ 56%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 83 out of 207 \/ 40%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Bundesliga-Football-Result-Predictions\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 22<\/b>: 2.Bundesliga 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2016-02-19:<\/td>\nRB Leipzig<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1.FC Union Berlin<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 48%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-19:<\/td>\nSpVgg Greuther F\u00fcrth<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nMSV Duisburg<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 48%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-19:<\/td>\nFC St.Pauli<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nFSV Frankfurt<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 48%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-20:<\/td>\nKarlsruher SC<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nEintracht Braunschweig<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 37%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-20:<\/td>\n1.FC Kaiserslautern<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1.FC Heidenheim 1846<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 44%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-21:<\/td>\nTSV 1860 M\u00fcnchen<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nVfL Bochum<\/b><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 35%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-21:<\/td>\nSV Sandhausen<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSC Freiburg<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 42%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-21:<\/td>\nArminia Bielefeld<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSC Paderborn 07<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 45%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-22:<\/td>\nFortuna D\u00fcsseldorf<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1.FC N\u00fcrnberg<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n@ 37%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 22<\/b>: 3 out of 9 \/ 33%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 78 out of 198 \/ 39%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Bundesliga-Football-Result-Predictions\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 21<\/b>: 2.Bundesliga 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2016-02-12:<\/td>\nSC Paderborn 07<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1.FC Kaiserslautern<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 34%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-12:<\/td>\nFC St.Pauli<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nRB Leipzig<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 47%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-12:<\/td>\nFSV Frankfurt<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSpVgg Greuther F\u00fcrth<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 36%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-13:<\/td>\n1.FC Heidenheim 1846<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSV Sandhausen<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n@ 43%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-13:<\/td>\nMSV Duisburg<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nKarlsruher SC<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 42%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-14:<\/td>\nSC Freiburg<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nFortuna D\u00fcsseldorf<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 51%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-14:<\/td>\nEintracht Braunschweig<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nArminia Bielefeld<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 33%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-14:<\/td>\n1.FC Union Berlin<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nTSV 1860 M\u00fcnchen<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 52%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-15:<\/td>\n1.FC N\u00fcrnberg<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nVfL Bochum<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 48%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 21<\/b>: 2 out of 9 \/ 22%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 75 out of 189 \/ 40%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Bundesliga-Football-Result-Predictions\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 20<\/b>: 2.Bundesliga 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2016-02-05:<\/td>\n1.FC Kaiserslautern<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1.FC Union Berlin<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 39%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-05:<\/td>\nVfL Bochum<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSC Freiburg<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 39%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-05:<\/td>\nSV Sandhausen<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSC Paderborn 07<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 36%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-06:<\/td>\nFortuna D\u00fcsseldorf<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1.FC Heidenheim 1846<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 37%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-06:<\/td>\nTSV 1860 M\u00fcnchen<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1.FC N\u00fcrnberg<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 43%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-07:<\/td>\nKarlsruher SC<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nFSV Frankfurt<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 49%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-07:<\/td>\nRB Leipzig<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nEintracht Braunschweig<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 53%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-07:<\/td>\nSpVgg Greuther F\u00fcrth<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nFC St.Pauli<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 41%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2016-02-08:<\/td>\nArminia Bielefeld<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nMSV Duisburg<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 56%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 20<\/b>: 3 out of 9 \/ 33%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 73 out of 180 \/ 41%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Bundesliga-Football-Result-Predictions\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 19<\/b>: 2.Bundesliga 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2015-12-18:<\/td>\n1.FC Union Berlin<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSV Sandhausen<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 43%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-18:<\/td>\nFC St.Pauli<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nKarlsruher SC<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 43%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-18:<\/td>\nFSV Frankfurt<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nArminia Bielefeld<\/b><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 37%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-19:<\/td>\nSpVgg Greuther F\u00fcrth<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nRB Leipzig<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n@ 49%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-19:<\/td>\n1.FC Heidenheim 1846<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1.FC N\u00fcrnberg<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 38%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-20:<\/td>\nSC Freiburg<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nTSV 1860 M\u00fcnchen<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 54%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-20:<\/td>\nEintracht Braunschweig<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1.FC Kaiserslautern<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n@ 44%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-20:<\/td>\nMSV Duisburg<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nVfL Bochum<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 43%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-21:<\/td>\nSC Paderborn 07<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nFortuna D\u00fcsseldorf<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 37%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 19<\/b>: 7 out of 9 \/ 78%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 70 out of 171 \/ 41%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Bundesliga-Football-Result-Predictions\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 18<\/b>: 2.Bundesliga 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2015-12-11:<\/td>\nVfL Bochum<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSC Paderborn 07<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 37%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n4<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-11:<\/td>\nTSV 1860 M\u00fcnchen<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1.FC Heidenheim 1846<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 45%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-11:<\/td>\nSV Sandhausen<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nEintracht Braunschweig<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 38%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-12:<\/td>\nKarlsruher SC<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSpVgg Greuther F\u00fcrth<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 42%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-12:<\/td>\nFortuna D\u00fcsseldorf<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1.FC Union Berlin<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 49%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-13:<\/td>\n1.FC Kaiserslautern<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nMSV Duisburg<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 47%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-13:<\/td>\nRB Leipzig<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nFSV Frankfurt<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 51%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-13:<\/td>\n1.FC N\u00fcrnberg<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSC Freiburg<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 47%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-14:<\/td>\nArminia Bielefeld<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nFC St.Pauli<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 42%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 18<\/b>: 3 out of 9 \/ 33%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 63 out of 162 \/ 39%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Bundesliga-Football-Result-Predictions\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 17<\/b>: 2.Bundesliga 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2015-12-04:<\/td>\n1.FC N\u00fcrnberg<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSC Paderborn 07<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n@ 48%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-04:<\/td>\nTSV 1860 M\u00fcnchen<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nFSV Frankfurt<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 43%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-04:<\/td>\nSV Sandhausen<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSpVgg Greuther F\u00fcrth<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n@ 42%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-05:<\/td>\nSC Freiburg<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1.FC Union Berlin<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 53%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-05:<\/td>\nArminia Bielefeld<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nKarlsruher SC<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 39%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-06:<\/td>\n1.FC Kaiserslautern<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nFC St.Pauli<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 41%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-06:<\/td>\nRB Leipzig<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nMSV Duisburg<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 63%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n4<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-06:<\/td>\nVfL Bochum<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1.FC Heidenheim 1846<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n@ 42%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-12-07:<\/td>\nFortuna D\u00fcsseldorf<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nEintracht Braunschweig<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 37%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 17<\/b>: 5 out of 9 \/ 56%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 60 out of 153 \/ 39%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Bundesliga-Football-Result-Predictions\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 16<\/b>: 2.Bundesliga 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2015-11-27:<\/td>\nEintracht Braunschweig<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nVfL Bochum<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 37%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-27:<\/td>\nSpVgg Greuther F\u00fcrth<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1.FC Kaiserslautern<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 36%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-27:<\/td>\n1.FC Heidenheim 1846<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSC Freiburg<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n@ 42%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-28:<\/td>\nSC Paderborn 07<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nTSV 1860 M\u00fcnchen<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 40%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n4<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-28:<\/td>\n1.FC Union Berlin<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nArminia Bielefeld<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n@ 38%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-29:<\/td>\nFC St.Pauli<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1.FC N\u00fcrnberg<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 40%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-29:<\/td>\nFSV Frankfurt<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nFortuna D\u00fcsseldorf<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 38%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-29:<\/td>\nMSV Duisburg<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSV Sandhausen<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 47%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-30:<\/td>\nKarlsruher SC<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nRB Leipzig<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 47%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 16<\/b>: 3 out of 9 \/ 33%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 55 out of 144 \/ 38%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Bundesliga-Football-Result-Predictions\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 15<\/b>: 2.Bundesliga 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2015-11-20:<\/td>\nFortuna D\u00fcsseldorf<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nMSV Duisburg<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 54%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-20:<\/td>\nVfL Bochum<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1.FC Union Berlin<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 41%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-20:<\/td>\nSV Sandhausen<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nKarlsruher SC<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 37%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-21:<\/td>\nTSV 1860 M\u00fcnchen<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nFC St.Pauli<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 41%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-21:<\/td>\nArminia Bielefeld<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nRB Leipzig<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 46%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-22:<\/td>\nSC Freiburg<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSC Paderborn 07<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 42%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n4<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-22:<\/td>\n1.FC Kaiserslautern<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nFSV Frankfurt<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 42%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-22:<\/td>\n1.FC Heidenheim 1846<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSpVgg Greuther F\u00fcrth<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 33%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-23:<\/td>\n1.FC N\u00fcrnberg<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nEintracht Braunschweig<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 39%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 15<\/b>: 2 out of 9 \/ 22%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 52 out of 135 \/ 39%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Bundesliga-Football-Result-Predictions\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 14<\/b>: 2.Bundesliga 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2015-11-06:<\/td>\nKarlsruher SC<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nVfL Bochum<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 38%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-06:<\/td>\nSpVgg Greuther F\u00fcrth<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nArminia Bielefeld<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 41%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-06:<\/td>\nFSV Frankfurt<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSV Sandhausen<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 38%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-07:<\/td>\n1.FC Union Berlin<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1.FC N\u00fcrnberg<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 37%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-07:<\/td>\nMSV Duisburg<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSC Freiburg<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 59%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-08:<\/td>\nSC Paderborn 07<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1.FC Heidenheim 1846<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 41%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-08:<\/td>\nRB Leipzig<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1.FC Kaiserslautern<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 55%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-08:<\/td>\nEintracht Braunschweig<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nTSV 1860 M\u00fcnchen<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 48%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-09:<\/td>\nFC St.Pauli<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nFortuna D\u00fcsseldorf<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 46%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n4<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 14<\/b>: 2 out of 9 \/ 22%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 50 out of 126 \/ 40%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Bundesliga-Football-Result-Predictions\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 13<\/b>: 2.Bundesliga 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2015-10-30:<\/td>\n1.FC Kaiserslautern<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nArminia Bielefeld<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 42%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-30:<\/td>\nFortuna D\u00fcsseldorf<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSpVgg Greuther F\u00fcrth<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 35%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-30:<\/td>\nVfL Bochum<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nFC St.Pauli<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n@ 36%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-31:<\/td>\nSC Paderborn 07<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nFSV Frankfurt<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 43%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-31:<\/td>\n1.FC Heidenheim 1846<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1.FC Union Berlin<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 48%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-01:<\/td>\nSC Freiburg<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nEintracht Braunschweig<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 41%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-01:<\/td>\nTSV 1860 M\u00fcnchen<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nMSV Duisburg<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n@ 52%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-01:<\/td>\nSV Sandhausen<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nRB Leipzig<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n@ 42%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-11-02:<\/td>\n1.FC N\u00fcrnberg<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nKarlsruher SC<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 33%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 13<\/b>: 4 out of 9 \/ 44%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 48 out of 117 \/ 41%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Bundesliga-Football-Result-Predictions\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 12<\/b>: 2.Bundesliga 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2015-10-23:<\/td>\nRB Leipzig<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nFortuna D\u00fcsseldorf<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 58%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-23:<\/td>\nSpVgg Greuther F\u00fcrth<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nTSV 1860 M\u00fcnchen<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 46%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-23:<\/td>\nFSV Frankfurt<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nVfL Bochum<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 42%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-24:<\/td>\nKarlsruher SC<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1.FC Kaiserslautern<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 36%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-24:<\/td>\n1.FC Union Berlin<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSC Paderborn 07<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 39%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-24:<\/td>\nMSV Duisburg<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1.FC N\u00fcrnberg<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 50%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-25:<\/td>\nEintracht Braunschweig<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1.FC Heidenheim 1846<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 38%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-25:<\/td>\nFC St.Pauli<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSC Freiburg<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 41%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-25:<\/td>\nArminia Bielefeld<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSV Sandhausen<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 31%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 12<\/b>: 3 out of 9 \/ 33%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 44 out of 108 \/ 41%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Bundesliga-Football-Result-Predictions\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 11<\/b>: 2.Bundesliga 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2015-10-16:<\/td>\nSC Paderborn 07<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nEintracht Braunschweig<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 44%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-16:<\/td>\nFortuna D\u00fcsseldorf<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nArminia Bielefeld<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 34%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-16:<\/td>\nSV Sandhausen<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1.FC Kaiserslautern<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 46%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-17:<\/td>\n1.FC N\u00fcrnberg<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nFSV Frankfurt<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 41%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-17:<\/td>\n1.FC Union Berlin<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nFC St.Pauli<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 46%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-18:<\/td>\nSC Freiburg<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSpVgg Greuther F\u00fcrth<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 47%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n5<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-18:<\/td>\nVfL Bochum<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nRB Leipzig<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 49%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-18:<\/td>\n1.FC Heidenheim 1846<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nMSV Duisburg<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 58%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-19:<\/td>\nTSV 1860 M\u00fcnchen<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nKarlsruher SC<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 42%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 11<\/b>: 3 out of 9 \/ 33%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 41 out of 99 \/ 41%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Bundesliga-Football-Result-Predictions\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 10<\/b>: 2.Bundesliga 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2015-10-02:<\/td>\n1.FC Kaiserslautern<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nFortuna D\u00fcsseldorf<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 47%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-02:<\/td>\nFSV Frankfurt<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1.FC Heidenheim 1846<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 36%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-02:<\/td>\nArminia Bielefeld<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nTSV 1860 M\u00fcnchen<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n@ 48%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-03:<\/td>\nSpVgg Greuther F\u00fcrth<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nVfL Bochum<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 37%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n5<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-03:<\/td>\nFC St.Pauli<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSV Sandhausen<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 42%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-04:<\/td>\nKarlsruher SC<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSC Freiburg<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 49%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-04:<\/td>\nRB Leipzig<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1.FC N\u00fcrnberg<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 41%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-04:<\/td>\nEintracht Braunschweig<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1.FC Union Berlin<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n@ 40%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-10-05:<\/td>\nMSV Duisburg<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSC Paderborn 07<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 48%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 10<\/b>: 3 out of 9 \/ 33%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 38 out of 90 \/ 42%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Bundesliga-Football-Result-Predictions\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 9<\/b>: 2.Bundesliga 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2015-09-25:<\/td>\n1.FC N\u00fcrnberg<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nArminia Bielefeld<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 56%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-25:<\/td>\nFortuna D\u00fcsseldorf<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSV Sandhausen<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 45%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-25:<\/td>\nVfL Bochum<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1.FC Kaiserslautern<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 54%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-26:<\/td>\nSC Paderborn 07<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nFC St.Pauli<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 32%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-26:<\/td>\n1.FC Union Berlin<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nMSV Duisburg<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 58%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-27:<\/td>\nSC Freiburg<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nFSV Frankfurt<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 45%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-27:<\/td>\nTSV 1860 M\u00fcnchen<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nRB Leipzig<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 52%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-27:<\/td>\n1.FC Heidenheim 1846<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nKarlsruher SC<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n@ 37%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-28:<\/td>\nEintracht Braunschweig<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSpVgg Greuther F\u00fcrth<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 41%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 9<\/b>: 4 out of 9 \/ 44%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 35 out of 81 \/ 43%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Bundesliga-Football-Result-Predictions\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 8<\/b>: 2.Bundesliga 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2015-09-22:<\/td>\nKarlsruher SC<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nFortuna D\u00fcsseldorf<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n@ 35%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-22:<\/td>\n1.FC Kaiserslautern<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1.FC N\u00fcrnberg<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 47%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-22:<\/td>\nSV Sandhausen<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nTSV 1860 M\u00fcnchen<\/b><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 41%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-22:<\/td>\nArminia Bielefeld<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nVfL Bochum<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 48%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-23:<\/td>\nSpVgg Greuther F\u00fcrth<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSC Paderborn 07<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 38%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-23:<\/td>\nFC St.Pauli<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1.FC Heidenheim 1846<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 36%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-23:<\/td>\nFSV Frankfurt<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1.FC Union Berlin<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 39%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-23:<\/td>\nMSV Duisburg<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nEintracht Braunschweig<\/b><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 54%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n5<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-24:<\/td>\nRB Leipzig<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSC Freiburg<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 43%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 8<\/b>: 4 out of 9 \/ 44%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 31 out of 72 \/ 43%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Bundesliga-Football-Result-Predictions\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 7<\/b>: 2.Bundesliga 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2015-09-18:<\/td>\nSC Freiburg<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nArminia Bielefeld<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 56%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-18:<\/td>\nVfL Bochum<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nFortuna D\u00fcsseldorf<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 53%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-18:<\/td>\n1.FC Heidenheim 1846<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nRB Leipzig<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n@ 49%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-19:<\/td>\nSC Paderborn 07<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nKarlsruher SC<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 25%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-19:<\/td>\n1.FC N\u00fcrnberg<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSV Sandhausen<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 43%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-19:<\/td>\nTSV 1860 M\u00fcnchen<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1.FC Kaiserslautern<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n@ 40%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-20:<\/td>\nEintracht Braunschweig<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nFC St.Pauli<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 41%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-20:<\/td>\n1.FC Union Berlin<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSpVgg Greuther F\u00fcrth<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 41%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-20:<\/td>\nMSV Duisburg<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nFSV Frankfurt<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 46%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 7<\/b>: 4 out of 9 \/ 44%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 27 out of 63 \/ 43%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Bundesliga-Football-Result-Predictions\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 6<\/b>: 2.Bundesliga 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2015-09-11:<\/td>\n1.FC Kaiserslautern<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSC Freiburg<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 39%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-11:<\/td>\nRB Leipzig<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSC Paderborn 07<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 44%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-11:<\/td>\nSV Sandhausen<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nVfL Bochum<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n@ 39%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-12:<\/td>\nKarlsruher SC<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1.FC Union Berlin<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 34%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-12:<\/td>\nArminia Bielefeld<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1.FC Heidenheim 1846<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 46%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-13:<\/td>\nFortuna D\u00fcsseldorf<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nTSV 1860 M\u00fcnchen<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 45%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-13:<\/td>\nSpVgg Greuther F\u00fcrth<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1.FC N\u00fcrnberg<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 40%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-13:<\/td>\nFSV Frankfurt<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nEintracht Braunschweig<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 46%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-09-14:<\/td>\nFC St.Pauli<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nMSV Duisburg<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 48%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 6<\/b>: 5 out of 9 \/ 56%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 23 out of 54 \/ 43%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Bundesliga-Football-Result-Predictions\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 5<\/b>: 2.Bundesliga 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2015-08-28:<\/td>\nSC Freiburg<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSV Sandhausen<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 37%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n4<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-08-28:<\/td>\n1.FC Union Berlin<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nRB Leipzig<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 46%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-08-28:<\/td>\n1.FC Heidenheim 1846<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1.FC Kaiserslautern<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 35%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-08-29:<\/td>\nSC Paderborn 07<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nArminia Bielefeld<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 42%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-08-29:<\/td>\nMSV Duisburg<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSpVgg Greuther F\u00fcrth<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 49%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-08-30:<\/td>\nEintracht Braunschweig<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nKarlsruher SC<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 37%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n6<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-08-30:<\/td>\n1.FC N\u00fcrnberg<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nFortuna D\u00fcsseldorf<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 49%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-08-30:<\/td>\nFSV Frankfurt<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nFC St.Pauli<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 37%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-08-31:<\/td>\nVfL Bochum<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nTSV 1860 M\u00fcnchen<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 55%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 5<\/b>: 4 out of 9 \/ 44%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 18 out of 45 \/ 40%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Bundesliga-Football-Result-Predictions\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 4<\/b>: 2.Bundesliga 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2015-08-21:<\/td>\nArminia Bielefeld<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nEintracht Braunschweig<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 43%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-08-21:<\/td>\nSV Sandhausen<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1.FC Heidenheim 1846<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 40%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-08-21:<\/td>\nSpVgg Greuther F\u00fcrth<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nFSV Frankfurt<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 31%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-08-22:<\/td>\nKarlsruher SC<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nMSV Duisburg<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 49%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-08-22:<\/td>\nFortuna D\u00fcsseldorf<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSC Freiburg<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 38%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-08-23:<\/td>\nTSV 1860 M\u00fcnchen<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1.FC Union Berlin<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 41%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-08-23:<\/td>\nVfL Bochum<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1.FC N\u00fcrnberg<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n@ 44%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-08-23:<\/td>\nRB Leipzig<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nFC St.Pauli<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 45%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-08-24:<\/td>\n1.FC Kaiserslautern<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSC Paderborn 07<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 33%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 4<\/b>: 3 out of 9 \/ 33%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 14 out of 36 \/ 39%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Bundesliga-Football-Result-Predictions\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 3<\/b>: 2.Bundesliga 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2015-08-14:<\/td>\nSC Paderborn 07<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSV Sandhausen<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 26%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n6<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-08-14:<\/td>\n1.FC Heidenheim 1846<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nFortuna D\u00fcsseldorf<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 32%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-08-14:<\/td>\nFSV Frankfurt<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nKarlsruher SC<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 35%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-08-15:<\/td>\nSC Freiburg<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nVfL Bochum<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 33%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-08-15:<\/td>\nEintracht Braunschweig<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nRB Leipzig<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 33%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-08-16:<\/td>\n1.FC Union Berlin<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1.FC Kaiserslautern<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 34%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-08-16:<\/td>\nFC St.Pauli<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSpVgg Greuther F\u00fcrth<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 36%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-08-16:<\/td>\nMSV Duisburg<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nArminia Bielefeld<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 40%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-08-17:<\/td>\n1.FC N\u00fcrnberg<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nTSV 1860 M\u00fcnchen<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 41%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 3<\/b>: 2 out of 9 \/ 22%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 11 out of 27 \/ 41%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Bundesliga-Football-Result-Predictions\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 2<\/b>: 2.Bundesliga 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2015-07-31:<\/td>\n1.FC N\u00fcrnberg<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1.FC Heidenheim 1846<\/b><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 25%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-07-31:<\/td>\nArminia Bielefeld<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nFSV Frankfurt<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 40%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-07-31:<\/td>\n1.FC Kaiserslautern<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nEintracht Braunschweig<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 33%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-08-01:<\/td>\nVfL Bochum<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nMSV Duisburg<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 31%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n3<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-08-01:<\/td>\nTSV 1860 M\u00fcnchen<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSC Freiburg<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 25%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-08-02:<\/td>\nFortuna D\u00fcsseldorf<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSC Paderborn 07<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 35%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-08-02:<\/td>\nKarlsruher SC<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nFC St.Pauli<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 29%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-08-02:<\/td>\nSV Sandhausen<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1.FC Union Berlin<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 30%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n4<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-08-03:<\/td>\nRB Leipzig<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSpVgg Greuther F\u00fcrth<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 29%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 2<\/b>: 5 out of 9 \/ 56%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 9 out of 18 \/ 50%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

\"Bundesliga-Football-Result-Predictions\"<\/p>\n

Matchday 1<\/b>: 2.Bundesliga 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
2015-07-24:<\/td>\nMSV Duisburg<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1.FC Kaiserslautern<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 20%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-07-25:<\/td>\nSpVgg Greuther F\u00fcrth<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nKarlsruher SC<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 25%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-07-25:<\/td>\nFC St.Pauli<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nArminia Bielefeld<\/b><\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n@ 29%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-07-25:<\/td>\nFSV Frankfurt<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nRB Leipzig<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n@ 20%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-07-26:<\/td>\nSC Paderborn 07<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nVfL Bochum<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 26%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-07-26:<\/td>\nEintracht Braunschweig<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nSV Sandhausen<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 25%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-07-26:<\/td>\n1.FC Union Berlin<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\nFortuna D\u00fcsseldorf<\/b><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n@ 29%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-07-26:<\/td>\n1.FC Heidenheim 1846<\/td>\n–<\/td>\nTSV 1860 M\u00fcnchen<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n@ 28%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2015-07-27:<\/td>\nSC Freiburg<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1.FC N\u00fcrnberg<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n@ 23%<\/td>\n>>><\/td>\n6<\/td>\n–<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Correct tendency for matchday<\/b> 1<\/b>: 4 out of 9 \/ 44%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)
Hit rate since matchday 1<\/b>: 4 out of 9 \/ 44%<\/b> (“by chance” would be \u00f8 ~33%)<\/p>\n

* DMSC (Data.Mining.Soccer-Confidence)<\/b> is a percentage of statistical confidence which provides insight about the statistical validity of a prediction. For more information about this artificial hybrid ratio check our section [Our analysis]<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Data mining software used: [Data.Mining.Fox\u00ae (DMF) by Easy.Data.Mining\u2122]<\/a><\/p>\n

\"Data-Mining-Soccer-top-of-page\"<\/a> \"Data-Mining-Soccer-football-result-prediction\"<\/a> \"DataMiningSoccer<\/a> \"DataMiningSoccer<\/a> \"DataMiningSoccer<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Football Result Predictions using Data MiningData mining software used: [Data.Mining.Fox\u00ae (DMF) by Easy.Data.Mining\u2122]Please be aware of our [liability disclaimer] regarding the following predictions. Final tables: 2.Bundesliga 2015\/16 Total table: Home table: Away table: Matchday 34: 2.Bundesliga 2015\/16: predictions @ z% DMSC* >>> real results: 2016-05-15: SC Paderborn 07 – 1.FC N\u00fcrnberg 1 – 1 @ … Continue reading 2.Bundesliga 2015\/16<\/span> →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"parent":771,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":[],"yoast_head":"\n\n\n\n\n\n